All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NULL ptr dereference in pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() on ARM
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:35:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160303173522.GA9189@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m337sapw89.fsf@t19.piap.pl>

Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:07:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Many ARM platforms use a wrapper:
> /*
>  * Compatibility wrapper for older platforms that do not care about
>  * passing the parent device.
>  */
> static inline void pci_common_init(struct hw_pci *hw)
> {
>         pci_common_init_dev(NULL, hw);
> }
> 
> which means that pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() can be called without
> a parent. This patch fixes the NULL pointer dereference.

What exactly is the impact of this?  Does this fix need to be in v4.5?
It sounds like it should be, but I need a little more detailed
justification, e.g., "platforms X, Y, Z don't boot at all without
this change."

> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@piap.pl>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 602eb42..f89db3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -4772,8 +4772,10 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
>  void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>  {
>  	static int use_dt_domains = -1;
> -	int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
> +	int domain = -1;
>  
> +	if (parent)
> +		domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
>  	/*
>  	 * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values.
>  	 *
> 
> -- 
> Krzysztof Halasa
> 
> Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
> Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix NULL ptr dereference in pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() on ARM
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:35:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160303173522.GA9189@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m337sapw89.fsf@t19.piap.pl>

Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:07:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Ha?asa wrote:
> Many ARM platforms use a wrapper:
> /*
>  * Compatibility wrapper for older platforms that do not care about
>  * passing the parent device.
>  */
> static inline void pci_common_init(struct hw_pci *hw)
> {
>         pci_common_init_dev(NULL, hw);
> }
> 
> which means that pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() can be called without
> a parent. This patch fixes the NULL pointer dereference.

What exactly is the impact of this?  Does this fix need to be in v4.5?
It sounds like it should be, but I need a little more detailed
justification, e.g., "platforms X, Y, Z don't boot at all without
this change."

> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Ha?asa <khalasa@piap.pl>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 602eb42..f89db3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -4772,8 +4772,10 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
>  void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>  {
>  	static int use_dt_domains = -1;
> -	int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
> +	int domain = -1;
>  
> +	if (parent)
> +		domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
>  	/*
>  	 * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values.
>  	 *
> 
> -- 
> Krzysztof Halasa
> 
> Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
> Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01  6:07 [PATCH] Fix NULL ptr dereference in pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() on ARM Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-01  6:07 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-03 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-03-03 17:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-04  6:13   ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-04  6:13     ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-04 16:27     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-04 16:27       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-07 13:54       ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-07 13:54         ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-07 22:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-07 22:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-08  3:01   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-08  3:01     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-08  4:24     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-08  4:24       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-08 10:49       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-08 10:49         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160303173522.GA9189@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.