From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Johann Obermayr <johann.obermayr@sigmatek.at>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] ipipe bug in gpio/irq for mx6
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:28:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160318122826.GA3345@hermes.click-hack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EBF155.6010006@sigmatek.at>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Johann Obermayr wrote:
> Am 18.03.2016 um 12:10 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:43:26AM +0100, Johann Obermayr wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> in the the git branch ipipe-3.0-imx6q
> > This I-pipe patch is really old now. Any chance to use a current
> > version of Xenomai?
> Not now. but we have started to change to 3.10.x with newer xenomai
> >> in the file arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c
> >>
> >> there is follow function.
> >>
> >> void __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc(struct ipipe_domain *ipd, unsigned irq)
> >> {
> >> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> >> struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> >> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
> >>
> >> if (chip == &gpio_irq_chip) {
> >> /* It is a gpio. */
> >> u32 gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> >> struct mxc_gpio_port *port = &mxc_gpio_ports[gpio / 32];
> >>
> >> if (ipd != &ipipe_root) {
> >> port->nonroot_gpios |= (1 << (gpio % 32));
> >> if (port->nonroot_gpios == (1 << (gpio % 32))) {
> >> __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)]
> >> &= ~(1 << (port->irq % 32));
> >> set_irq_prio(port->irq, 1);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> } else
> >> set_irq_prio(irq, ipd != &ipipe_root);
> >> }
> >>
> >> But there is missing set_irq_prio for the port->irq_high.
> >> to add
> >> if (port->irq_high > 0)
> >> set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 1);
> >> is not my problem.
> >>
> >> my problem is, that i don't known if __ipipe_irqbits is handled
> >> correct.
> > Well, if you want to set port->irq_high, you have to clear the
> > corresponding bit in __ipipe_irqbits, as is done for port->irq.
> >
> Thank you Gilles.
>
> i've also take a part from newer version.
> void __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc(struct ipipe_domain *ipd, unsigned irq)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
>
> if (chip == &gpio_irq_chip) {
> /* It is a gpio. */
> u32 gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> struct mxc_gpio_port *port = &mxc_gpio_ports[gpio / 32];
>
> if (ipd == &ipipe_root) {
> port->nonroot_gpios &= ~(1 << (gpio % 32));
> if (port->nonroot_gpios == 0) {
> __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)] &= ~(1 << (port->irq
> % 32));
> __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq_high / 32)] &= ~(1 <<
> (port->irq_high % 32));
> set_irq_prio(port->irq, 0);
> if (port->irq_high > 0)
> set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 0);
> }
> } else {
> port->nonroot_gpios |= (1 << (gpio % 32));
> if (port->nonroot_gpios == (1 << (gpio % 32))) {
> __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)] &= ~(1 << (port->irq
> % 32));
> __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq_high / 32)] &= ~(1 <<
> (port->irq_high % 32));
> set_irq_prio(port->irq, 1);
> if (port->irq_high > 0)
> set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 1);
> }
> }
> } else
> set_irq_prio(irq, ipd != &ipipe_root);
> }
>
> is this correct to clear the the bit in __ipipe_irqbits also for ipd ==
> ipipe_root ?
It is useless, __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc for root irqs is called
only once at boot time, when the bits are already cleared.
--
Gilles.
https://click-hack.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 10:43 [Xenomai] ipipe bug in gpio/irq for mx6 Johann Obermayr
2016-03-18 11:10 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-03-18 12:15 ` Johann Obermayr
2016-03-18 12:28 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2016-03-23 11:01 ` Johann Obermayr
2016-03-23 11:12 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160318122826.GA3345@hermes.click-hack.org \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=johann.obermayr@sigmatek.at \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.