Re: [PATCH] driver: input :touchscreen : add Raydium I2C touch driver

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:46:51PM +0800, jeffrey.lin wrote:
> Hi Dmitry:
> I've finished issues under the format you suggested as below.
> 
> >#define RM_RESET_MSG_ADDR	0x40000004
> >#define RM_FASTBOOT_MSG_ADDR	0x50000620
> 
> >#define RM_MAX_READ_SIZE	63
> change maximum read size to 56 bytes
> #define RM_MAX_READ_SIZE	56

OK.

> 
> >#define RM_CONTACT_X_POS	1
> >#define RM_CONTACT_Y_POS	3
> >#define RM_CONTACT_PRESSURE_POS	5 // XXX - check - original was 4
> #define RM_CONTACT_PRESSURE_POS	5	/*FIXME, correct 5*/

OK.

> 
> >#define RM_BL_WRT_CMD_SIZE	3	/* bl flash wrt cmd size */
> >#define RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE	32	/* bl wrt pkg size */
> >#define RM_BL_WRT_LEN		(RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE + RM_BL_WRT_CMD_SIZE)
> >#define RM_FW_PAGE_SIZE		128
> >#define RM_MAX_FW_RETRIES	30
> additional maximum firmware size for protection
> #define RM_MAX_FW_SIZE		(0xD000)	/*define max firmware size*/

OK.

> 
> >static int raydium_i2c_read_message(struct i2c_client *client,
> >				    u32 addr, void *data, size_t len)
> >{
> >	__be32 be_addr;
> >	size_t xfer_len;
> >	int error;
> >	while (len) {
> >		xfer_len = min_t(size_t, len, RM_MAX_READ_SIZE);
> >
> >		be_addr = cpu_to_be32(addr);
> >
> >		error = raydium_i2c_send(client, RM_CMD_BANK_SWITCH,
> >					 &be_addr, sizeof(be_addr));
> >		if (!error)
> >			error = raydium_i2c_read(client, addr & 0xff,
> >						 data, xfer_len);
> Change as:
> 		if (!error)
> 			error = raydium_i2c_read(client, (be_addr >> 24) & 0xff,
> 						 data, xfer_len);

I think it is the same on LE, and I suspect it will not work correctly
on BE... You want to have the 8 least significant bits of the bank to be
used as the address, right?

> 
> >static int raydium_i2c_send_message(struct i2c_client *client,
> >				    u32 addr, const void *data, size_t len)
> >{
> >	__be32 be_addr = cpu_to_be32(addr);
> >	int error;
> >	error = raydium_i2c_send(client, RM_CMD_BANK_SWITCH,
> >				 &be_addr, sizeof(be_addr));
> >	if (!error)
> >		error = raydium_i2c_send(client, addr & 0xff, data, len);
> Change as:
> 		error = raydium_i2c_send(client, (be_addr >> 24) & 0xff,
> 				data, len);

Same here.

> 
> 
> >static int raydium_i2c_fastboot(struct i2c_client *client)
> >{
> 	/*FIXME;Correct, direct access mode is word alignment*/
> >	u8 buf[4];
> >	int error;
> >
> >	error = raydium_i2c_read_message(client, RM_FASTBOOT_MSG_ADDR,
> >					 buf, sizeof(buf));
> 
> >static int raydium_i2c_check_fw_status(struct raydium_data *ts)
> >{
> >	struct i2c_client *client = ts->client;
> >	static const u8 bl_area[] = { 0x62, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74 };
> >	static const u8 main_area[] = { 0x66, 0x69, 0x72, 0x6d };
> >	u8 buf[4];
> >	int error;
> >
> >	error = raydium_i2c_read(client, RM_CMD_BOOT_READ, buf, sizeof(buf));
> >	if (!error) {
> >		// XXX FIXME: why do we compare only 1st bytes? Do we even
> >		// need 4-byte constants?
> >		if (buf[0] == bl_area[0])
> >			ts->boot_mode = RAYDIUM_TS_BLDR;
> >		else if (buf[0] == main_area[0])
> >			ts->boot_mode = RAYDIUM_TS_MAIN;
> >		return 0;
> >	}
> >
> >	return error;
> >}
> Change as below,
> static int raydium_i2c_check_fw_status(struct raydium_data *ts)
> {
> 	struct i2c_client *client = ts->client;
> 	static const u8 bl_ack = 0x62;
> 	static const u8 main_ack = 0x66;
> 	u8 buf[4];
> 	int error;
> 
> 	error = raydium_i2c_read(client, RM_CMD_BOOT_READ, buf, sizeof(buf));
> 	if (!error) {
> 		/*FIXME, changed as one byte comparison*/
> 		if (buf[0] == bl_ack)
> 			ts->boot_mode = RAYDIUM_TS_BLDR;
> 		else if (buf[0] == main_ack)
> 			ts->boot_mode = RAYDIUM_TS_MAIN;
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> 
> 	return error;
> }
> 
> >static int raydium_i2c_fw_write_page(struct i2c_client *client,
> >				     u8 page_idx, void *data, size_t len)
> >{
> >	u8 buf[RM_BL_WRT_LEN];
> >	u8 pkg_idx = 1;
> >	size_t xfer_len;
> >	int error;
> >
> >	while (len) {
> >		xfer_len = min_t(size_t, len, RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE);
> >
> >		buf[BL_HEADER] = 0x0b;
> >		// XXX FIXME: is this correct? Do we really want all pages
> >		// after 1st to have 0xff? Should it be a counter?
> >		// Why do we need both pages and packages within pages?
> >		buf[BL_PAGE_STR] = page_idx ? 0 : 0xff;
> >		buf[BL_PKG_IDX] = pkg_idx;
> >		memcpy(&buf[BL_DATA_STR], data, xfer_len);
> >
> >		error = raydium_i2c_write_object(client, buf, xfer_len,
> >						 RAYDIUM_WAIT_READY);
> >		if (error) {
> >			dev_err(&client->dev,
> >				"page write command failed for page %d, chunk %d: %d\n",
> >				page_idx, pkg_idx, error);
> >			return error;
> >		}
> >
> >		msleep(20);
> >
> >		data += xfer_len;
> >		len -= xfer_len;
> >		pkg_idx++;
> >	}
> >
> >	return error;
> >}
> Because of need fully fill 128bytes in pages, so that function change as below:

I see. In this case, how about we do:

> static int raydium_i2c_fw_write_page(struct i2c_client *client,
> 				     u16 page_idx, const void *data, size_t len)
> {
> 	u8 buf[RM_BL_WRT_LEN];
> 	u8 pkg_idx = 1;
> 	u8 div_cnt;
> 	size_t xfer_len;
> 	int error;
> 	int i;
> 
> 	div_cnt = len % RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE ?
> 		len / RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE + 1:len / RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE;

Drop this. BTW, if you ever need it we have DIV_ROUND_UP macro.

> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < div_cnt; i++) {

	while (len) {

> 		xfer_len = min_t(size_t, len, RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE);
> 		buf[BL_HEADER] = RM_CMD_BOOT_PAGE_WRT;
> 		/*FIXME,Touch MCU need zero index as start page*/
> 		buf[BL_PAGE_STR] = page_idx ? 0xff : 0;
> 		buf[BL_PKG_IDX] = pkg_idx++;
> 
> 		memcpy(&buf[BL_DATA_STR], data, xfer_len);

		/* we need to pad to full page size */
		if (len < RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE)
			memset(&buf[BL_DATA_STR] + len, 0xff,
				RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE - len);
> 
> 		if (len == 0)
> 			memset(buf + BL_DATA_STR, 0xff, RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE);
> 		else if (len < RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE)
> 			memset(buf + BL_DATA_STR + xfer_len, 0xff,
> 			RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE - xfer_len);
> 
> 		error = raydium_i2c_write_object(client, buf, RM_BL_WRT_LEN,
> 						 RAYDIUM_WAIT_READY);
> 		if (error) {
> 			dev_err(&client->dev,
> 				"page write command failed for page %d, chunk %d: %d\n",
> 				page_idx, pkg_idx, error);
> 			return error;
> 		}
> 		data += RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE;
> 		len -= RM_BL_WRT_PKG_SIZE;
> 	}
> 
> 	return error;
> }
> 
> >static void raydium_mt_event(struct raydium_data *ts)
> >{
> >	int i;
> >	int error;
> memory allocate
> 	ts->report_data = kmalloc(ts->report_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!ts->report_data)
> 		return;

I thought I was allocating it after I queried the touchscreen
parameters... If not it was oversight. I do not think we should be
doing this on every interrupt, so please do the allocation in ->probe()
code.

> >
> >	error = raydium_i2c_read_message(ts->client, ts->data_bank_addr,
> >					 ts->report_data, ts->report_size);
> >	if (error) {
> >		dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "%s: failed to read data: %d\n",
> >			__func__, error);
> >		return;
> 		goto out_of_event;
> >	}
> >
> >
> >	for (i = 0; i < ts->report_size / ts->contact_size; i++) {
> >		u8 *contact = &ts->report_data[ts->contact_size * i];
> >		bool state = contact[RM_CONTACT_STATE_POS];
> >		u8 wx, wy;
> >
> >		input_mt_slot(ts->input, i);
> >		input_mt_report_slot_state(ts->input, MT_TOOL_FINGER, state);
> >
> >		if (!state)
> >			continue;
> >
> >		input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
> >				get_unaligned_le16(&contact[RM_CONTACT_X_POS]));
> >		input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
> >				get_unaligned_le16(&contact[RM_CONTACT_Y_POS]));
> >		input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_PRESSURE,
> >				contact[RM_CONTACT_PRESSURE_POS]);
> >
> >		wx = contact[RM_CONTACT_WIDTH_X_POS];
> >		wy = contact[RM_CONTACT_WIDTH_Y_POS];
> >
> >		input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, max(wx, wy));
> >		input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MINOR, min(wx, wy));
> >	}
> >
> >	input_mt_sync_frame(ts->input);
> >	input_sync(ts->input);
> out_of_event:
> 	kfree(ts->report_data);
> >}
> 
> 

Please prepare full new patch and post it so I can give it one more look
over before I can merge it.

Thanks!

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html