From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
<bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mempool: replace c memcpy code semantics with optimized rte_memcpy
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:30:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601070018.GA26922@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574DFC9A.2050304@6wind.com>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Jerin,
Hi Olivier,
>
> >>> /* Add elements back into the cache */
> >>> - for (index = 0; index < n; ++index, obj_table++)
> >>> - cache_objs[index] = *obj_table;
> >>> + rte_memcpy(&cache_objs[0], obj_table, sizeof(void *) * n);
> >>>
> >>> cache->len += n;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I also checked in the get_bulk() function, which looks like that:
> >>
> >> /* Now fill in the response ... */
> >> for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1;
> >> index < n;
> >> ++index, len--, obj_table++)
> >> *obj_table = cache_objs[len];
> >>
> >> I think we could replace it by something like:
> >>
> >> rte_memcpy(obj_table, &cache_objs[len - n], sizeof(void *) * n);
> >>
> >> The only difference is that it won't reverse the pointers in the
> >> table, but I don't see any problem with that.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > In true sense, it will _not_ be LIFO. Not sure about cache usage implications
> > on the specific use cases.
>
> Today, the objects pointers are reversed only in the get(). It means
> that this code:
>
> rte_mempool_get_bulk(mp, table, 4);
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> printf("obj = %p\n", t[i]);
> rte_mempool_put_bulk(mp, table, 4);
>
>
> printf("-----\n");
> rte_mempool_get_bulk(mp, table, 4);
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> printf("obj = %p\n", t[i]);
> rte_mempool_put_bulk(mp, table, 4);
>
> prints:
>
> addr1
> addr2
> addr3
> addr4
> -----
> addr4
> addr3
> addr2
> addr1
>
> Which is quite strange.
IMO, It is the expected LIFO behavior. Right ?
What is not expected is the following, which is the case after change. Or Am I
missing something here?
addr1
addr2
addr3
addr4
-----
addr1
addr2
addr3
addr4
>
> I don't think it would be an issue to replace the loop by a
> rte_memcpy(), it may increase the copy speed and it will be
> more coherent with the put().
>
>
> Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 14:50 [PATCH] mbuf: replace c memcpy code semantics with optimized rte_memcpy Jerin Jacob
2016-05-24 14:59 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-24 15:17 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-27 10:24 ` Hunt, David
2016-05-27 11:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-27 15:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-30 8:44 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-27 13:45 ` Hunt, David
2016-06-24 15:56 ` Hunt, David
2016-06-24 16:02 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-26 8:07 ` [PATCH v2] mempool: " Jerin Jacob
2016-05-30 8:45 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-31 12:58 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-31 21:05 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-01 7:00 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-06-02 7:36 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-02 9:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-02 21:16 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-03 7:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-17 10:40 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-24 16:04 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-30 9:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-30 11:38 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-30 12:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Jerin Jacob
2016-06-30 17:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-05 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-05 11:32 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-05 13:13 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-05 13:42 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-05 14:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-06 16:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-07 13:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160601070018.GA26922@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.