From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: replace c memcpy code semantics with optimized rte_memcpy
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:02:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576D5982.1060302@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576D5837.3060907@intel.com>
Hi Dave,
On 06/24/2016 05:56 PM, Hunt, David wrote:
> Hi Jerin,
>
> I just ran a couple of tests on this patch on the latest master head on
> a couple of machines. An older quad socket E5-4650 and a quad socket
> E5-2699 v3
>
> E5-4650:
> I'm seeing a gain of 2% for un-cached tests and a gain of 9% on the
> cached tests.
>
> E5-2699 v3:
> I'm seeing a loss of 0.1% for un-cached tests and a gain of 11% on the
> cached tests.
>
> This is purely the autotest comparison, I don't have traffic generator
> results. But based on the above, I don't think there are any performance
> issues with the patch.
>
Thanks for doing the test on your side. I think it's probably enough
to integrate Jerin's patch .
About using a rte_memcpy() in the mempool_get(), I don't think I'll have
the time to do a more exhaustive test before the 16.07, so I'll come
back with it later.
I'm sending an ack on the v2 thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 14:50 [PATCH] mbuf: replace c memcpy code semantics with optimized rte_memcpy Jerin Jacob
2016-05-24 14:59 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-24 15:17 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-27 10:24 ` Hunt, David
2016-05-27 11:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-27 15:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-30 8:44 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-27 13:45 ` Hunt, David
2016-06-24 15:56 ` Hunt, David
2016-06-24 16:02 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-05-26 8:07 ` [PATCH v2] mempool: " Jerin Jacob
2016-05-30 8:45 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-31 12:58 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-05-31 21:05 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-01 7:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-02 7:36 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-02 9:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-02 21:16 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-03 7:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-17 10:40 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-24 16:04 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-30 9:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-30 11:38 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-06-30 12:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Jerin Jacob
2016-06-30 17:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-05 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-05 11:32 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-05 13:13 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-07-05 13:42 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-05 14:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-06 16:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-07 13:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576D5982.1060302@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.