All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Brian Norris
	<briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:05:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704110504.10a15c1c@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704085336.GT6247-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:53:36 +0200
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 05:47:52PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > I'm waiting for reviews or acks. AFAIR, I addressed all the comments
> > Thierry made on my v2, so I guess we're good on the PWM side, but that
> > would be good to have a review from Mark now that we agreed on the PWM
> > APIs.  
> 
> I've already have one round of review invalidated by changes in the PWM
> bits so I've been deprioritising it until it's clear that the churn
> there has stopped.  I understand things are supposed to be quieting down
> but I also have a bunch of other things to look at...

I understand, but can we still expect to have it in 4.8 (I mean,
assuming Thierry is okay taking the first 2 patching for 4.8 too)?

Thanks,

Boris

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:05:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704110504.10a15c1c@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704085336.GT6247@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:53:36 +0200
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 05:47:52PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > I'm waiting for reviews or acks. AFAIR, I addressed all the comments
> > Thierry made on my v2, so I guess we're good on the PWM side, but that
> > would be good to have a review from Mark now that we agreed on the PWM
> > APIs.  
> 
> I've already have one round of review invalidated by changes in the PWM
> bits so I've been deprioritising it until it's clear that the churn
> there has stopped.  I understand things are supposed to be quieting down
> but I also have a bunch of other things to look at...

I understand, but can we still expect to have it in 4.8 (I mean,
assuming Thierry is okay taking the first 2 patching for 4.8 too)?

Thanks,

Boris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-04  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-28  4:53 [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode Douglas Anderson
2016-06-28 10:32 ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-28 18:52 ` Mark Brown
     [not found]   ` <20160628185244.GT17217-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 19:31     ` Doug Anderson
2016-06-28 19:31       ` Doug Anderson
     [not found]       ` <CAD=FV=UNMhDYy3r+4a4FF8Ndwt+qNuV7_pOC=kzoaUxLfYYp4Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 19:53         ` Mark Brown
2016-06-28 19:53           ` Mark Brown
     [not found] ` <1467089591-7631-1-git-send-email-dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 16:07   ` Brian Norris
2016-06-28 16:07     ` Brian Norris
2016-06-28 18:56   ` Mark Brown
2016-06-28 18:56     ` Mark Brown
     [not found]     ` <20160628185656.GU17217-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 19:35       ` Doug Anderson
2016-06-28 19:35         ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-01  8:06 ` Mark Brown
     [not found]   ` <20160701080614.GA9196-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-01 20:17     ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-01 20:17       ` Doug Anderson
     [not found]       ` <CAD=FV=WKR_Fq6o34886RCY-T-6AKdRqFz9H1aTiRq7Zu=o8TWA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-02  7:59         ` Mark Brown
2016-07-02  7:59           ` Mark Brown
2016-07-06 18:30           ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-07  8:17             ` Mark Brown
2016-07-02 15:47         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-02 15:47           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-04  8:53           ` Mark Brown
2016-07-04  8:53             ` Mark Brown
     [not found]             ` <20160704085336.GT6247-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-04  9:05               ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-07-04  9:05                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-04  9:13                 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-04  9:13                   ` Mark Brown
2016-07-08 16:41                   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-06 12:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-06 18:31   ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-07  8:16     ` Mark Brown
2016-07-07  8:03   ` Mark Brown
2016-07-07  8:03     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160704110504.10a15c1c@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.