All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:42:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802174253.GA4628@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802103322.13810-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>

Hi!

> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

> -core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, 0644);
> +core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);

Everyone knows what 0644 is, but noone can read S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR |
S_IRCRP | S_IROTH (*). Please don't do this.

									Pavel
















































(*) I deliberately included an error there. Did you spot the error?
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:42:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802174253.GA4628@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802103322.13810-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>

Hi!

> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

> -core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, 0644);
> +core_param(no_bL_switcher, no_bL_switcher, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);

Everyone knows what 0644 is, but noone can read S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR |
S_IRCRP | S_IROTH (*). Please don't do this.

									Pavel
















































(*) I deliberately included an error there. Did you spot the error?
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02 10:33 [PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-02 10:33 ` Baole Ni
2016-08-02 11:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-02 11:29   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-02 13:15 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-08-02 13:15   ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-08-02 15:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-08-02 15:08     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-08-02 17:42 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2016-08-02 17:42   ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-02 17:52   ` Joe Perches
2016-08-02 17:52     ` Joe Perches
2016-08-02 17:54     ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-02 17:54       ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802174253.GA4628@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.