3 meta-networking patches

3 meta-networking patches

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 454 bytes --]

Hi Joe,

can you please confirm state of thes change:
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/128859/
it's Accepted on patchwork, but still applicable and included i
master-next.

I'll drop these 2 from master-next as they are marked as
Rejected/Changes-Requested now:
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/122365/
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/125839/

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 169 bytes --]

Re: 3 meta-networking patches

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 804 bytes --]

Hey Martin,

[3 meta-networking patches] On 16.09.15 (Thu 10:39) Martin Jansa wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> 
> can you please confirm state of thes change:
> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/128859/
> it's Accepted on patchwork, but still applicable and included i
> master-next.

Curious.  I'll scoop that up this morning.  It looks pretty obvious.

> I'll drop these 2 from master-next as they are marked as
> Rejected/Changes-Requested now:
> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/122365/
> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/125839/

Yep, the former had a lot of discussion around it and ultimately the
rationale wasn't solid.  The latter was resolved with patches to
waf-samba as a generic solution rather than piecemeal, as this was
doing.

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]