From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, timur@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux@rainbow-software.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
wim@djo.tudelft.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013182528.GC21529@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475615720-31047-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. This patch does a partial
> revert for the SCI functionality only.
>
> The commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") is
> for the removal of the function. SCI penalty API was replaced by the
> runtime penalty calculation based on the value of
> acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
>
> The IRQ type does not get updated at the right time for some platforms and
> results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI IRQs as
> irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
>
> The register_gsi function delivers the IRQ found in the ACPI table to
> the interrupt controller driver. Penalties are calculated before a
> link object is enabled to find out which interrupt has the least number
> of users. By the time penalties are calculated, the IRQ is not registered
> yet and the API returns the wrong type.
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
> mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> + acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
> /*
> * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 06c2a11..6a2af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -495,27 +495,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>
> static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> {
> - int penalty = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> - * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> - * use for PCI IRQs.
> - */
> - if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> - u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> - else
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> -
> - if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - return penalty + acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)
> + return acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> - penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> - return penalty;
> + return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> }
>
> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -886,6 +869,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> + if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> + polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + else
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
This would be a lot easier to read if the trigger/polarity tests were
positive, e.g.,
if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
else
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, timur@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux@rainbow-software.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
wim@djo.tudelft.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013182528.GC21529@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475615720-31047-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. This patch does a partial
> revert for the SCI functionality only.
>
> The commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") is
> for the removal of the function. SCI penalty API was replaced by the
> runtime penalty calculation based on the value of
> acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
>
> The IRQ type does not get updated at the right time for some platforms and
> results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI IRQs as
> irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
>
> The register_gsi function delivers the IRQ found in the ACPI table to
> the interrupt controller driver. Penalties are calculated before a
> link object is enabled to find out which interrupt has the least number
> of users. By the time penalties are calculated, the IRQ is not registered
> yet and the API returns the wrong type.
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
> mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> + acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
> /*
> * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 06c2a11..6a2af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -495,27 +495,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>
> static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> {
> - int penalty = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> - * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> - * use for PCI IRQs.
> - */
> - if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> - u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> - else
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> -
> - if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - return penalty + acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)
> + return acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> - penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> - return penalty;
> + return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> }
>
> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -886,6 +869,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> + if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> + polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + else
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
This would be a lot easier to read if the trigger/polarity tests were
positive, e.g.,
if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
else
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013182528.GC21529@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475615720-31047-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. This patch does a partial
> revert for the SCI functionality only.
>
> The commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") is
> for the removal of the function. SCI penalty API was replaced by the
> runtime penalty calculation based on the value of
> acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
>
> The IRQ type does not get updated at the right time for some platforms and
> results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI IRQs as
> irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
>
> The register_gsi function delivers the IRQ found in the ACPI table to
> the interrupt controller driver. Penalties are calculated before a
> link object is enabled to find out which interrupt has the least number
> of users. By the time penalties are calculated, the IRQ is not registered
> yet and the API returns the wrong type.
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
> mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> + acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
> /*
> * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 06c2a11..6a2af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -495,27 +495,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>
> static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> {
> - int penalty = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> - * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> - * use for PCI IRQs.
> - */
> - if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> - u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> - else
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> -
> - if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - return penalty + acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)
> + return acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> - penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> - return penalty;
> + return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> }
>
> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -886,6 +869,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> + if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> + polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + else
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
This would be a lot easier to read if the trigger/polarity tests were
positive, e.g.,
if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
else
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
bhelgaas@google.com, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com,
linux@rainbow-software.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013182528.GC21529@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475615720-31047-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:19PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
> by the time get_penalty function is called. This patch does a partial
> revert for the SCI functionality only.
>
> The commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function") is
> for the removal of the function. SCI penalty API was replaced by the
> runtime penalty calculation based on the value of
> acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
>
> The IRQ type does not get updated at the right time for some platforms and
> results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI IRQs as
> irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
>
> The register_gsi function delivers the IRQ found in the ACPI table to
> the interrupt controller driver. Penalties are calculated before a
> link object is enabled to find out which interrupt has the least number
> of users. By the time penalties are calculated, the IRQ is not registered
> yet and the API returns the wrong type.
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/283
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger,
> polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
>
> mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
> + acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
>
> /*
> * stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 06c2a11..6a2af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -495,27 +495,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
>
> static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> {
> - int penalty = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> - * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> - * use for PCI IRQs.
> - */
> - if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> - u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> -
> - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> - else
> - penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> -
> - if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - return penalty + acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)
> + return acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> - penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> - return penalty;
> + return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> }
>
> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> @@ -886,6 +869,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> + if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> + polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + else
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
This would be a lot easier to read if the trigger/polarity tests were
positive, e.g.,
if (trigger == ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL &&
polarity == ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
else
acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
> * e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
> int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
> +void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
> void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 21:15 [PATCH V2 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for SCI Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-12 22:13 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-12 22:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-12 22:46 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-12 22:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 18:15 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 19:36 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 19:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 19:36 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 20:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 20:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 20:16 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 20:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 20:16 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-13 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-13 21:01 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-15 3:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 3:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 3:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-12 19:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-12 19:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-04 21:15 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 21:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-05 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-05 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-13 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-10-13 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-13 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-11 21:55 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for SCI Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-11 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013182528.GC21529@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.