From: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com>,
Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@hgst.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
<chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>,
<suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:08:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014180832.GA6788@hgst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161014053449.GA16510@infradead.org>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: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com>,
Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@hgst.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com,
suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:08:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014180832.GA6788@hgst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161014053449.GA16510@infradead.org>
Th 10/13/2016 22:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Style wise you can further remove the extra parens around
> > SCpnt->device->tagged_supported
> > As well as the now redundant braces.
>
> I did send a patch looking just like that earlier :)
I'll remove the patch from the patchset. I must have missed the patch
you are referencing.
Take care,
Adam
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com>,
Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@hgst.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
<chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>,
<suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:08:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014180832.GA6788@hgst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161014053449.GA16510@infradead.org>
Th 10/13/2016 22:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Style wise you can further remove the extra parens around
> > SCpnt->device->tagged_supported
> > As well as the now redundant braces.
>
> I did send a patch looking just like that earlier :)
I'll remove the patch from the patchset. I must have missed the patch
you are referencing.
Take care,
Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-14 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 23:00 [PATCH v5 0/4] Enabling ATA Command Priorities Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] block: Add iocontext priority to request Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:36 ` Shaun Tancheff
2016-10-13 23:36 ` Shaun Tancheff
2016-10-14 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-14 18:08 ` Adam Manzanares [this message]
2016-10-14 18:08 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-14 18:08 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:23 ` Tejun Heo
2016-10-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:00 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:22 ` Tejun Heo
2016-10-13 23:37 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:37 ` Adam Manzanares
2016-10-13 23:37 ` Adam Manzanares
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161014180832.GA6788@hgst.com \
--to=adam.manzanares@wdc.com \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=adam.manzanares@hgst.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=shaun.tancheff@seagate.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.