Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Including images on Sphinx documents

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>]

Em Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:44:28 +0100
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> escreveu:

> > > > You had pointed me to this plugin before
> > > > https://pythonhosted.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
> > > > 
> > > > but I don't think it can actually represent any of the pictures.  
> > > 
> > > No, but there are some ascii art images inside some txt/rst files
> > > and inside some kernel-doc comments. We could either use the above
> > > extension for them or to convert into some image. The ascii art
> > > images I saw seem to be diagrams, so Graphviz would allow replacing
> > > most of them, if not all.  
> > 
> > Please don't replace ASCII art that effectively conveys conceptual
> > diagrams.  If you do, we'll wind up in situations where someone
> > hasn't built the docs and doesn't possess the tools to see a diagram
> > that was previously shown by every text editor (or can't be bothered
> > to dig out the now separate file).  In the name of creating
> > "prettier" diagrams (and final doc), we'll have damaged capacity to
> > understand stuff by just reading the source if this diagram is in
> > kernel doc comments.  I think this is a good application of "if it
> > ain't broke, don't fix it".  

I agree with it as a general rule. Yet, there are cases where the diagram 
is so complex that rewriting it with Graphviz would make sense, like
the one on this document:

	Documentation/media/v4l-drivers/pxa_camera.rst

Regards,
Mauro



> 
> Right, I agree completely!
> 
> That's the selling point of aafig though, it translates to pretty
> diagrams, but looks fine when viewed in a normal text editor (with
> fixed-width font)
> 
> I had a hack elsewhere that would embed the fixed-width text if the
> plugin isn't present, which seemed like a decent compromise, but nobody
> is willing to let plugins be used in general to start with, it seems :)
> 
> johannes


Thanks,
Mauro