From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161124141149.GE2213@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9qB7P2epMGdwFJ3vJR3vt-bBxU0nKwmKdpaOpTKdqzzA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24.11.16 13:58:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 13:51, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> > On 24.11.16 13:44:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2016 at 13:42, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> >> > On 23.11.16 21:25:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> Why? MEMREMAP_WB is used often, among other things for mapping
> >> >> firmware tables, which are marked as NOMAP, so in these cases, the
> >> >> linear address is not mapped.
> >> >
> >> > If fw tables are mapped wb, that is wrong and needs a separate fix.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why is that wrong?
> >
> > The whole issue with mapping acpi tables is not marking them cachable,
> > what wb does.
>
> What 'issue'?
>
> > Otherwise we could just use linear mapping for those mem
> > ranges.
> >
>
> Regions containing firmware tables are owned by the firmware, and it
> is the firmware that tells us which memory attributes we are allowed
> to use. If those attributes include WB, it is perfectly legal to use a
> cacheable mapping. That does *not* mean they should be covered by the
> linear mapping. The linear mapping is read-write-non-exec, for
> instance, and we may prefer to use a read-only mapping and/or
> executable mapping.
Ok, I am going to fix try_ram_remap().
Are there other concerns with this patch?
Thanks,
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robert.richter@cavium.com (Robert Richter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161124141149.GE2213@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9qB7P2epMGdwFJ3vJR3vt-bBxU0nKwmKdpaOpTKdqzzA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24.11.16 13:58:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 13:51, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> > On 24.11.16 13:44:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2016 at 13:42, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> >> > On 23.11.16 21:25:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> Why? MEMREMAP_WB is used often, among other things for mapping
> >> >> firmware tables, which are marked as NOMAP, so in these cases, the
> >> >> linear address is not mapped.
> >> >
> >> > If fw tables are mapped wb, that is wrong and needs a separate fix.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why is that wrong?
> >
> > The whole issue with mapping acpi tables is not marking them cachable,
> > what wb does.
>
> What 'issue'?
>
> > Otherwise we could just use linear mapping for those mem
> > ranges.
> >
>
> Regions containing firmware tables are owned by the firmware, and it
> is the firmware that tells us which memory attributes we are allowed
> to use. If those attributes include WB, it is perfectly legal to use a
> cacheable mapping. That does *not* mean they should be covered by the
> linear mapping. The linear mapping is read-write-non-exec, for
> instance, and we may prefer to use a read-only mapping and/or
> executable mapping.
Ok, I am going to fix try_ram_remap().
Are there other concerns with this patch?
Thanks,
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161124141149.GE2213@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9qB7P2epMGdwFJ3vJR3vt-bBxU0nKwmKdpaOpTKdqzzA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24.11.16 13:58:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 13:51, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> > On 24.11.16 13:44:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2016 at 13:42, Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com> wrote:
> >> > On 23.11.16 21:25:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> Why? MEMREMAP_WB is used often, among other things for mapping
> >> >> firmware tables, which are marked as NOMAP, so in these cases, the
> >> >> linear address is not mapped.
> >> >
> >> > If fw tables are mapped wb, that is wrong and needs a separate fix.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why is that wrong?
> >
> > The whole issue with mapping acpi tables is not marking them cachable,
> > what wb does.
>
> What 'issue'?
>
> > Otherwise we could just use linear mapping for those mem
> > ranges.
> >
>
> Regions containing firmware tables are owned by the firmware, and it
> is the firmware that tells us which memory attributes we are allowed
> to use. If those attributes include WB, it is perfectly legal to use a
> cacheable mapping. That does *not* mean they should be covered by the
> linear mapping. The linear mapping is read-write-non-exec, for
> instance, and we may prefer to use a read-only mapping and/or
> executable mapping.
Ok, I am going to fix try_ram_remap().
Are there other concerns with this patch?
Thanks,
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-24 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-06 9:52 [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section Robert Richter
2016-10-06 9:52 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-06 9:52 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <1475747527-32387-1-git-send-email-rrichter-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-06 10:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-06 10:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-06 10:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu-oYzSn_eeqaX3QVFeQjBGkaX-Wh7+oPcQFcXv7J6GOFQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-06 16:11 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-06 16:11 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-06 16:11 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161006161114.GH22012-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-17 18:58 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-17 18:58 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-17 18:58 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161017185801.GT25086-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-27 16:01 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-27 16:01 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-27 16:01 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20161027160136.GD24290-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-28 9:19 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-28 9:19 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-28 9:19 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-07 21:05 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-07 21:05 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-09 19:51 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-09 19:51 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161109195132.GZ22012-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-17 14:25 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-17 14:25 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-17 14:25 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-17 15:18 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-17 15:18 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-17 15:18 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161117151805.GJ2151-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-20 17:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-20 17:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-20 17:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-23 21:15 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-23 21:15 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-23 21:15 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161123211538.GH10776-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-23 21:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-23 21:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-23 21:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:42 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 13:42 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 13:42 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161124134238.GI10776-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-24 13:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:51 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 13:51 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161124135151.GJ10776-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-24 13:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 13:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 14:11 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2016-11-24 14:11 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 14:11 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 14:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 14:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 14:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 15:09 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 15:09 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161124150918.GF2213-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-24 19:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 19:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 19:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-24 19:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-24 19:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu_C_17RtAiw2U0OOzVik3G7KkwUTo5eiGK-HDo-maQ-bA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-25 11:29 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-25 11:29 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-25 11:29 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <20161125112914.GI2213-vWBEXY7mpu582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-25 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 17:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 17:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 17:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-18 10:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-18 10:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-18 10:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-18 15:02 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-18 15:02 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-18 15:02 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Robert Richter
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Robert Richter
2016-10-10 15:33 ` David Daney
2016-10-10 15:33 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161124141149.GE2213@rric.localdomain \
--to=robert.richter@cavium.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.