Re: mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)

Re: mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> + Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow)
> 
> kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> writes:
> 
> > mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/
> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/
> >
> > Tree: mainline
> > Branch: local/master
> > Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec
> > Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e
> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207
> >
> > Boot Regressions Detected:
> >
> > arm:
> >
> >     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
> >         exynos5250-snow:
> >             lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c)
> >
> > Boot Failure Detected:
> >
> > arm:
> >
> >     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n
> >         exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab

Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts).
Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect?

Best regads,
Krzysztof

Re: mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)

[Kevin Hilman]

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> + Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow)
>> 
>> kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> writes:
>> 
>> > mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)
>> >
>> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/
>> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/
>> >
>> > Tree: mainline
>> > Branch: local/master
>> > Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec
>> > Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e
>> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> > Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207
>> >
>> > Boot Regressions Detected:
>> >
>> > arm:
>> >
>> >     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>> >         exynos5250-snow:
>> >             lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c)
>> >
>> > Boot Failure Detected:
>> >
>> > arm:
>> >
>> >     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n
>> >         exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab
>
> Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts).
> Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect?

The bisect[1] pointed to this, but that doesn't smell right, and I
wasn't able to dig into it any further:

2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c is the first bad commit
commit 2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c
Author: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri Nov 25 09:45:28 2016 +1100

Full bisect log is here[1].

Kevin

[1] https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/171/console