From: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: omap: remove devm_request_threaded_irq
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:04:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161209230457.GO4920@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db75608b-f92c-6bfa-80a9-a3ab3adf7c23-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [161209 14:46]:
>
>
> On 12/09/2016 03:59 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [161209 12:55]:
> > > Switch back from devm_request_threaded_irq() to request_threaded_irq() to
> > > avoid races between interrupt handler execution and PM runtime in error
> > > handling code path in probe and in dwc3_omap_remove():
> >
> > Can't you just call disable_irq() on the exit path instead of removing
> > devm?
> >
>
> I can. But what will be the benefit from using devm then?
Hmm good point. Probably the least number of code would be to just
do NOAUTOEN before devm_request_irq(), then only do enable_irq()
just before returning from the probe. After all, we don't really
want the irq running until the probe is done.
I think that would leave out the extra handling from the error
path?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: omap: remove devm_request_threaded_irq
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:04:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161209230457.GO4920@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db75608b-f92c-6bfa-80a9-a3ab3adf7c23@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [161209 14:46]:
>
>
> On 12/09/2016 03:59 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [161209 12:55]:
> > > Switch back from devm_request_threaded_irq() to request_threaded_irq() to
> > > avoid races between interrupt handler execution and PM runtime in error
> > > handling code path in probe and in dwc3_omap_remove():
> >
> > Can't you just call disable_irq() on the exit path instead of removing
> > devm?
> >
>
> I can. But what will be the benefit from using devm then?
Hmm good point. Probably the least number of code would be to just
do NOAUTOEN before devm_request_irq(), then only do enable_irq()
just before returning from the probe. After all, we don't really
want the irq running until the probe is done.
I think that would leave out the extra handling from the error
path?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-09 20:55 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: omap: remove devm_request_threaded_irq Grygorii Strashko
2016-12-09 20:55 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <20161209205508.6456-1-grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 21:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-12-09 21:59 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20161209215958.GN4920-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 22:46 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-12-09 22:46 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <db75608b-f92c-6bfa-80a9-a3ab3adf7c23-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 23:04 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-12-09 23:04 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20161209230457.GO4920-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 23:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-12-09 23:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <e394c44c-3ae3-b0ac-2b02-a886ca2510bd-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 23:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-12-09 23:37 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20161209233728.GP4920-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-09 23:44 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-12-09 23:44 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161209230457.GO4920@atomide.com \
--to=tony-4v6ys6ai5vpbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.