All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Brian Boylston <brian.boylston@hpe.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ross
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170122183046.GA7359@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR21MB00368E95CBB533D4C761C882CB730@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> No, I mean a network filesystem like 9p or cifs or nfs.  If the memcpy
> is supposed to be performed by the backing device

struct backing_dev has no relation to the DAX code.  Even more so what's
the point of doing a DAXish memcpy in that case?  If we buffer in
memory for network I/O we should just use the page cache.

> (Also, the network filesystem might have a command, like RDMA has/will have, to ensure that the write has reached persistence)

I know very well due to my work for a DAX-backed pNFS layout.  But that
is mostly transparent to the NFS frontend code and won't use DAX
on the client at all.  Just pagecache as a source for RDMA READ/WRITE.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170122183046.GA7359@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR21MB00368E95CBB533D4C761C882CB730@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> No, I mean a network filesystem like 9p or cifs or nfs.  If the memcpy
> is supposed to be performed by the backing device

struct backing_dev has no relation to the DAX code.  Even more so what's
the point of doing a DAXish memcpy in that case?  If we buffer in
memory for network I/O we should just use the page cache.

> (Also, the network filesystem might have a command, like RDMA has/will have, to ensure that the write has reached persistence)

I know very well due to my work for a DAX-backed pNFS layout.  But that
is mostly transparent to the NFS frontend code and won't use DAX
on the client at all.  Just pagecache as a source for RDMA READ/WRITE.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Brian Boylston <brian.boylston@hpe.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170122183046.GA7359@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR21MB00368E95CBB533D4C761C882CB730@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> No, I mean a network filesystem like 9p or cifs or nfs.  If the memcpy
> is supposed to be performed by the backing device

struct backing_dev has no relation to the DAX code.  Even more so what's
the point of doing a DAXish memcpy in that case?  If we buffer in
memory for network I/O we should just use the page cache.

> (Also, the network filesystem might have a command, like RDMA has/will have, to ensure that the write has reached persistence)

I know very well due to my work for a DAX-backed pNFS layout.  But that
is mostly transparent to the NFS frontend code and won't use DAX
on the client at all.  Just pagecache as a source for RDMA READ/WRITE.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	Brian Boylston <brian.boylston@hpe.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170122183046.GA7359@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR21MB00368E95CBB533D4C761C882CB730@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> No, I mean a network filesystem like 9p or cifs or nfs.  If the memcpy
> is supposed to be performed by the backing device

struct backing_dev has no relation to the DAX code.  Even more so what's
the point of doing a DAXish memcpy in that case?  If we buffer in
memory for network I/O we should just use the page cache.

> (Also, the network filesystem might have a command, like RDMA has/will have, to ensure that the write has reached persistence)

I know very well due to my work for a DAX-backed pNFS layout.  But that
is mostly transparent to the NFS frontend code and won't use DAX
on the client at all.  Just pagecache as a source for RDMA READ/WRITE.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-22 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-20  3:50 [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86, dax, pmem: remove indirection around memcpy_from_pmem() Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] block, dax: introduce dax_operations Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
     [not found]   ` <148488422405.37913.13366670089124790849.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-20 17:28     ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 17:28       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 17:28       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 17:28       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86, dax, pmem: introduce 'copy_from_iter' dax operation Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-02-03  1:52   ` [lkp-robot] [x86, dax, pmem] 2e12109d1c: fio.write_bw_MBps -75% regression kernel test robot
2017-02-03  1:52     ` kernel test robot
2017-02-03  1:52     ` kernel test robot
2017-02-03  1:52     ` kernel test robot
2017-02-17  3:52   ` [PATCH 03/13] x86, dax, pmem: introduce 'copy_from_iter' dax operation Ross Zwisler
2017-02-17  3:52     ` Ross Zwisler
2017-02-17  3:52     ` Ross Zwisler
2017-02-17  3:56     ` Dan Williams
2017-02-17  3:56       ` Dan Williams
2017-02-17  3:56       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] dax, pmem: introduce an optional 'flush' " Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86, dax: replace clear_pmem() with open coded memset + dax_ops->flush Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 10:27   ` Jan Kara
2017-01-20 10:27     ` Jan Kara
2017-01-20 10:27     ` Jan Kara
2017-01-20 15:33     ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 15:33       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20 15:33       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86, dax, libnvdimm: move wb_cache_pmem() to libnvdimm Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86, libnvdimm, pmem: move arch_invalidate_pmem() " Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86, libnvdimm, dax: stop abusing __copy_user_nocache Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:50   ` Dan Williams
2017-03-28 16:21   ` Ross Zwisler
2017-03-28 16:21     ` Ross Zwisler
2017-03-28 16:21     ` Ross Zwisler
2017-03-28 16:26     ` Dan Williams
2017-03-28 16:26       ` Dan Williams
2017-03-28 16:26       ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51 ` [PATCH 09/13] libnvdimm, pmem: implement cache bypass for all copy_from_iter() operations Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51 ` [PATCH 10/13] libnvdimm, pmem: fix persistence warning Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51 ` [PATCH 11/13] libnvdimm, nfit: enable support for volatile ranges Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51 ` [PATCH 12/13] libnvdimm, pmem: disable dax flushing when pmem is fronting a volatile region Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51 ` [PATCH 13/13] libnvdimm, pmem: disable dax flushing for 'cache flush on fail' platforms Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-20  3:51   ` Dan Williams
     [not found] ` <148488421301.37913.12835362165895864897.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-21 16:28   ` [PATCH 00/13] dax, pmem: move cpu cache maintenance to libnvdimm Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-21 16:28     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-21 17:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-21 17:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-21 17:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-21 17:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]       ` <20170121175212.GA28180-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-22 15:43         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 15:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 15:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found]           ` <BY2PR21MB00367799FE7B7E8302A99260CB730-vtcBUbTck+B5JOYzoceCCc1VXTxX1y3OvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-22 16:29             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 16:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 16:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 16:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:19               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 18:19                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 18:30                 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-22 18:30                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:30                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:30                   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]                   ` <20170122183046.GA7359-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-22 18:39                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 18:39                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-22 18:39                       ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found]                       ` <BY2PR21MB0036CC7935BFE438EA001763CB730-vtcBUbTck+B5JOYzoceCCc1VXTxX1y3OvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-22 18:44                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:44                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:44                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 18:44                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23  6:37                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-23  6:37                             ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found]                             ` <BY2PR21MB0036CA85562DDD21814C0B27CB720-vtcBUbTck+B5JOYzoceCCc1VXTxX1y3OvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-23  7:10                               ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23  7:10                                 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23  7:10                                 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23  7:10                                 ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 16:00                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 16:00                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 16:00                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 17:14                                   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 17:14                                     ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 17:14                                     ` Dan Williams
     [not found]                                     ` <CAPcyv4gAbwS9yKNgAN9ytpDg7Jqh1FubZbGSfbFP0f-DdXPpCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-23 18:03                                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 18:03                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 18:03                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 18:03                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]                                         ` <20170123180314.GA23073-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-23 18:31                                           ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 18:31                                             ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 18:31                                             ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 18:31                                             ` Dan Williams
2017-01-23 15:58                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 15:58                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 15:58                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-22 17:30         ` Dan Williams
2017-01-22 17:30           ` Dan Williams
2017-01-22 17:30           ` Dan Williams
2017-01-22 17:30           ` Dan Williams
     [not found]           ` <CAPcyv4jEXsjw_Mo3aLRFmJr8ThqLPJPjdPjz7Q3ZS0ZC-AaDBw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-23 16:01             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 16:01               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 16:01               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-23 16:01               ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170122183046.GA7359@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=brian.boylston@hpe.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.