From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, mgorman@suse.de, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:54:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170207165451.GE7512@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201702071930.EJJ69255.SQOMVLJOFtOHFF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:30:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Brian Foster wrote:
> > > The workload is to write to a single file on XFS from 10 processes demonstrated at
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201512052133.IAE00551.LSOQFtMFFVOHOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
> > > using "while :; do ./oom-write; done" loop on a VM with 4CPUs / 2048MB RAM.
> > > With this XFS_FILBLKS_MIN() change applied, I no longer hit assertion failures.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for testing. Well, that's an interesting workload. I couldn't
> > reproduce on a few quick tries in a similarly configured vm.
>
> It takes 10 to 15 minutes. Maybe some size threshold involved?
>
> > /tmp/file _is_ on an XFS filesystem in your test, correct? If so and if
> > you still have the output file from a test that reproduced, could you
> > get the 'xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" <file>' output?
>
> Here it is.
>
> [ 720.199748] 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly
> [ 720.199749] 150524 pages reserved
> [ 720.199749] 0 pages cma reserved
> [ 720.199750] 0 pages hwpoisoned
> [ 722.187335] XFS: Assertion failed: oldlen > newlen, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 2867
> [ 722.201784] ------------[ cut here ]------------
...
>
> # ls -l /tmp/file
> -rw------- 1 kumaneko kumaneko 43426648064 Feb 7 19:25 /tmp/file
> # xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /tmp/file
> /tmp/file:
> EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
> 0: [0..262015]: 358739712..359001727 262016 0x0
...
> 187: [84810808..84901119]: 110211736..110302047 90312 0x1
Ok, from the size of the file I realized that I missed you were running
in a loop the first time around. I tried playing with it some more and
still haven't been able to reproduce.
Anyways, the patch intended to fix this has been reviewed[1] and queued
for the next release, so it's probably not a big deal since you've
already verified it. Thanks again.
Brian
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg04083.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, mgorman@suse.de, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:54:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170207165451.GE7512@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201702071930.EJJ69255.SQOMVLJOFtOHFF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:30:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Brian Foster wrote:
> > > The workload is to write to a single file on XFS from 10 processes demonstrated at
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201512052133.IAE00551.LSOQFtMFFVOHOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
> > > using "while :; do ./oom-write; done" loop on a VM with 4CPUs / 2048MB RAM.
> > > With this XFS_FILBLKS_MIN() change applied, I no longer hit assertion failures.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for testing. Well, that's an interesting workload. I couldn't
> > reproduce on a few quick tries in a similarly configured vm.
>
> It takes 10 to 15 minutes. Maybe some size threshold involved?
>
> > /tmp/file _is_ on an XFS filesystem in your test, correct? If so and if
> > you still have the output file from a test that reproduced, could you
> > get the 'xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" <file>' output?
>
> Here it is.
>
> [ 720.199748] 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly
> [ 720.199749] 150524 pages reserved
> [ 720.199749] 0 pages cma reserved
> [ 720.199750] 0 pages hwpoisoned
> [ 722.187335] XFS: Assertion failed: oldlen > newlen, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 2867
> [ 722.201784] ------------[ cut here ]------------
...
>
> # ls -l /tmp/file
> -rw------- 1 kumaneko kumaneko 43426648064 Feb 7 19:25 /tmp/file
> # xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /tmp/file
> /tmp/file:
> EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
> 0: [0..262015]: 358739712..359001727 262016 0x0
...
> 187: [84810808..84901119]: 110211736..110302047 90312 0x1
Ok, from the size of the file I realized that I missed you were running
in a loop the first time around. I tried playing with it some more and
still haven't been able to reproduce.
Anyways, the patch intended to fix this has been reviewed[1] and queued
for the next release, so it's probably not a big deal since you've
already verified it. Thanks again.
Brian
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg04083.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-07 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 13:44 [RFC PATCH 0/2] fix unbounded too_many_isolated Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 14:46 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 14:46 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 15:54 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 15:54 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 16:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 16:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 17:00 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 17:00 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 17:29 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 17:29 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 10:07 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-19 10:07 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-19 11:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 11:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 13:11 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-19 13:11 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-20 13:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-20 13:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-21 7:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-21 7:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 10:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 10:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25 10:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 10:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 11:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 11:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-27 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-27 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-28 15:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-28 15:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-30 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-30 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-02 10:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-02 10:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 10:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-03 10:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-03 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 14:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 14:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 17:24 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-03 17:24 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-06 6:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-06 6:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-06 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-06 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-06 14:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 14:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 15:47 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-06 15:47 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-07 10:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-07 10:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-07 16:54 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-02-07 16:54 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-03 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-05 10:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-05 10:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-06 10:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 10:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 10:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 10:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 21:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 21:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-21 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-21 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-21 14:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-21 14:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-21 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-21 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-22 2:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-22 2:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-26 6:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-26 6:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-31 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-31 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-31 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-31 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-31 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-31 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 10:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pagesper zone Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 10:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 12:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 12:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, vmscan: account the number of isolated pages per zone Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 13:13 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-25 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-20 6:42 ` Hillf Danton
2017-01-20 6:42 ` Hillf Danton
2017-01-20 9:25 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-20 9:25 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm, vmscan: do not loop on too_many_isolated for ever Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170207165451.GE7512@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.