From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] bcm2835-audio: Fix checkpatch errors
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:03:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213120340.GA25852@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAExP5d4F-8mkcDjyNMYT0Kah11oGwbbg6hRaveOZuq065-2=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:49:06AM +0800, Man Choy wrote:
> A quick question, I just updated my linux-next tree last night,
> checkout tag "next-20170210" and working on the cleanup. How do I
> double check my current working file already been updated by someone
> else to avoid the duplicate work? As of now, the latest linux-next
> tree tag is still "next-20170210"
linux-next is usually a day or so behind my tree, due to the time
differences when it is created and why I usually do work.
You can work off of my staging-next branch in my staging.git tree on
git.kernel.org, that is the most up-to-date branch that ends up in
linux-next. I also use staging-testing, to test things, but I would not
recommend that for you as it can be rebased and would be a pain to work
against.
It's ok that conflicts happen, that's how kernel development works,
sometimes people send in the same change minutes from each other, so I
have to take the one that was sent first. It's ok, just move on and
work on something else if you really want to.
> I am on eudyptula challenge and this is my first attempt to send
> kernel patch, sorry about the silly question ;)
It's not silly, it comes up all the time.
good luck!
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Man Choy <manchoyy@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
mzoran@crowfest.net, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm2835-audio: Fix checkpatch errors
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:03:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213120340.GA25852@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAExP5d4F-8mkcDjyNMYT0Kah11oGwbbg6hRaveOZuq065-2=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:49:06AM +0800, Man Choy wrote:
> A quick question, I just updated my linux-next tree last night,
> checkout tag "next-20170210" and working on the cleanup. How do I
> double check my current working file already been updated by someone
> else to avoid the duplicate work? As of now, the latest linux-next
> tree tag is still "next-20170210"
linux-next is usually a day or so behind my tree, due to the time
differences when it is created and why I usually do work.
You can work off of my staging-next branch in my staging.git tree on
git.kernel.org, that is the most up-to-date branch that ends up in
linux-next. I also use staging-testing, to test things, but I would not
recommend that for you as it can be rebased and would be a pain to work
against.
It's ok that conflicts happen, that's how kernel development works,
sometimes people send in the same change minutes from each other, so I
have to take the one that was sent first. It's ok, just move on and
work on something else if you really want to.
> I am on eudyptula challenge and this is my first attempt to send
> kernel patch, sorry about the silly question ;)
It's not silly, it comes up all the time.
good luck!
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-11 20:34 [PATCH] bcm2835-audio: Fix checkpatch errors Man Choy
2017-02-11 20:34 ` Man Choy
2017-02-12 12:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-12 12:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-13 0:49 ` Man Choy
2017-02-13 0:49 ` Man Choy
2017-02-13 12:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-02-13 12:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-14 1:16 ` Man Choy
2017-02-14 1:16 ` Man Choy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213120340.GA25852@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.