All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:33:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306153331.GP6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ZDxk2CkaGaqVJfrzoBf4ZXDZ2L8vaAnLOjuY0yx85jgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:24:23PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> We could involve compiler (and by compiler I mean clang, because we
> are not going to touch gcc, any volunteers?).

FWIW, clang isn't even close to being a viable compiler for the kernel.
It lacks far too many features, _IF_ you can get it to compiler in the
first place.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:33:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306153331.GP6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ZDxk2CkaGaqVJfrzoBf4ZXDZ2L8vaAnLOjuY0yx85jgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:24:23PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> We could involve compiler (and by compiler I mean clang, because we
> are not going to touch gcc, any volunteers?).

FWIW, clang isn't even close to being a viable compiler for the kernel.
It lacks far too many features, _IF_ you can get it to compiler in the
first place.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-06 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06 12:42 [PATCH] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:42 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:50   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 12:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 14:24       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 14:24         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 15:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 15:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 16:04           ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 16:04             ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 15:33         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-06 15:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 16:20         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 16:20           ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 16:27           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 16:27             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 17:25             ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 17:25               ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 20:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 20:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-08 13:42             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-08 15:20               ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 15:20                 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 15:27                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-08 15:27                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-08 15:43                   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 15:43                     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 15:45                     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-08 15:45                       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-08 15:48                       ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 15:48                         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-08 17:43                 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-08 17:43                   ` Will Deacon
2017-03-14 15:22                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-14 15:31                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:31                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:32                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:32                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:44                       ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 15:44                         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-14 19:25                         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-14 19:25                           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 16:48         ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-06 16:48           ` Andrey Ryabinin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170306153331.GP6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.