From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
okaya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
sunil.kovvuri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:28:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530102831.GJ2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524180143.19855-7-jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:01:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> * TLB invalidation by range is batched and committed with a single sync.
> Batching ATC invalidation is inconvenient, endpoints limit the number of
> inflight invalidations. We'd have to count the number of invalidations
> queued and send a sync periodically. In addition, I suspect we always
> need a sync between TLB and ATC invalidation for the same page.
This sounds like the number of outstanding ATS invalidations is not
managed by the SMMU hardware, is that right?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
will.deacon@arm.com, okaya@codeaurora.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, tn@semihalf.com, sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:28:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530102831.GJ2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524180143.19855-7-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:01:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> * TLB invalidation by range is batched and committed with a single sync.
> Batching ATC invalidation is inconvenient, endpoints limit the number of
> inflight invalidations. We'd have to count the number of invalidations
> queued and send a sync periodically. In addition, I suspect we always
> need a sync between TLB and ATC invalidation for the same page.
This sounds like the number of outstanding ATS invalidations is not
managed by the SMMU hardware, is that right?
Joerg
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:28:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530102831.GJ2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524180143.19855-7-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:01:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> * TLB invalidation by range is batched and committed with a single sync.
> Batching ATC invalidation is inconvenient, endpoints limit the number of
> inflight invalidations. We'd have to count the number of invalidations
> queued and send a sync periodically. In addition, I suspect we always
> need a sync between TLB and ATC invalidation for the same page.
This sounds like the number of outstanding ATS invalidations is not
managed by the SMMU hardware, is that right?
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 18:01 [PATCH 0/7] Add PCI ATS support to SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI: Move ATS declarations outside of CONFIG_PCI Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/of: Check ATS capability in root complex nodes Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <20170524180143.19855-1-jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: PCI: Describe ATS property for " Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-30 10:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 10:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 10:58 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-30 10:58 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <035be7ba-e850-a5a9-08fa-802a04feb600-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 17:17 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-31 17:17 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-31 17:17 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <20170524180143.19855-3-jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 17:23 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-31 17:23 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-31 17:23 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-01 12:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-01 12:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-01 12:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-05 17:20 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-05 17:20 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-05 17:20 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-06 11:11 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-06 11:11 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-06 11:11 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <65aea93f-d516-f045-f216-3f56e96bdeb6-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 11:38 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-20 11:38 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-20 11:38 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] ACPI/IORT: Check ATS capability in " Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Link domains and devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <20170524180143.19855-7-jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-30 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-05-30 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 10:58 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-30 10:58 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable tagged pointers Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-24 18:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-05-31 15:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] Add PCI ATS support to SMMUv3 Nate Watterson
2017-05-31 15:27 ` Nate Watterson
2017-05-31 15:27 ` Nate Watterson
2017-06-01 12:23 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-01 12:23 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2017-06-01 12:23 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530102831.GJ2818@8bytes.org \
--to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=okaya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sunil.kovvuri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.