From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Plumb the correct acquire ctx into intel_crtc_disable_noatomic()
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:05:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601160541.GQ12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgpbhihb.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:48:16PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2017, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > If intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() were to ever get called during resume
> > e'd end up deadlocking since resume has its own acqcuire_ctx but
> > intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() still tries to use the
> > mode_config.acquire_ctx. Pass down the correct acquire ctx from the top.
>
> Same here, have we seen this, or "just" theoretical?
Happens on my 830 after adding the pipes powerwell. Before that the
machine resumed with both pipes off and the pipe A quirk left
crtc->active as false so intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() didn't get
called.
Hmm. Actually, now that I think about it more, I believe this should
happen for S4 even without the new powerwell since both pipes should
have been enabled by the BIOS when resuming from S4. I'll have to
run a proper to test to verify that.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: e2c8b8701e2d ("drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend, v2.")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 2f76a63efe8c..4e3c64ed4131 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -5839,7 +5839,8 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_disable(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> > intel_update_watermarks(intel_crtc);
> > }
> >
> > -static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > +static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > {
> > struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > @@ -5869,7 +5870,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - state->acquire_ctx = crtc->dev->mode_config.acquire_ctx;
> > + state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
> >
> > /* Everything's already locked, -EDEADLK can't happen. */
> > crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, intel_crtc);
> > @@ -15257,7 +15258,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > plane = crtc->plane;
> > crtc->base.primary->state->visible = true;
> > crtc->plane = !plane;
> > - intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base);
> > + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base, ctx);
> > crtc->plane = plane;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -15273,7 +15274,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > /* Adjust the state of the output pipe according to whether we
> > * have active connectors/encoders. */
> > if (crtc->active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc))
> > - intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base);
> > + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base, ctx);
> >
> > if (crtc->active || HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
> > /*
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Plumb the correct acquire ctx into intel_crtc_disable_noatomic()
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:05:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601160541.GQ12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgpbhihb.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:48:16PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2017, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > If intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() were to ever get called during resume
> > e'd end up deadlocking since resume has its own acqcuire_ctx but
> > intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() still tries to use the
> > mode_config.acquire_ctx. Pass down the correct acquire ctx from the top.
>
> Same here, have we seen this, or "just" theoretical?
Happens on my 830 after adding the pipes powerwell. Before that the
machine resumed with both pipes off and the pipe A quirk left
crtc->active as false so intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() didn't get
called.
Hmm. Actually, now that I think about it more, I believe this should
happen for S4 even without the new powerwell since both pipes should
have been enabled by the BIOS when resuming from S4. I'll have to
run a proper to test to verify that.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: e2c8b8701e2d ("drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend, v2.")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 2f76a63efe8c..4e3c64ed4131 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -5839,7 +5839,8 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_disable(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> > intel_update_watermarks(intel_crtc);
> > }
> >
> > -static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > +static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > {
> > struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > @@ -5869,7 +5870,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - state->acquire_ctx = crtc->dev->mode_config.acquire_ctx;
> > + state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
> >
> > /* Everything's already locked, -EDEADLK can't happen. */
> > crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, intel_crtc);
> > @@ -15257,7 +15258,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > plane = crtc->plane;
> > crtc->base.primary->state->visible = true;
> > crtc->plane = !plane;
> > - intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base);
> > + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base, ctx);
> > crtc->plane = plane;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -15273,7 +15274,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > /* Adjust the state of the output pipe according to whether we
> > * have active connectors/encoders. */
> > if (crtc->active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc))
> > - intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base);
> > + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base, ctx);
> >
> > if (crtc->active || HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
> > /*
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Ville Syrj�l�
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 14:36 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Pipe A quirk rework ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Fix deadlock witha the pipe A quirk during resume ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 16:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 16:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-02 7:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-02 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Plumb the correct acquire ctx into intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:36 ` ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 16:05 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-06-01 16:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 17:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 17:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Use a loop for the "three times for luck" DPLL procedure ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:48 ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-01 16:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 14:49 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Add i830 "pipes power well" ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:46 ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-01 16:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-06 7:04 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-06-06 10:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Drop pipe A quirk for Toshiba Protege R205-S209 ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Drop pipe A quirk for Thinkapd T60 ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Remove pipe A quirk remnants ville.syrjala
2017-06-01 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Pipe A quirk rework Chris Wilson
2017-06-01 14:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-06-15 13:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170601160541.GQ12629@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.