From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:49:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705184933.GD3305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hr+p+Bo8dcPfnW+O2q0KWvoM5z9LPZWhXLFJgE5ySojA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:15:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:49:18PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > Use consistent name between IORES_DESC and enum memory_type, rename
> >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC to MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT. This is to free up
> >> > the public name for CDM (cache coherent device memory) for which the
> >> > term public is a better match.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > include/linux/memremap.h | 4 ++--
> >> > kernel/memremap.c | 2 +-
> >> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > index 57546a07a558..2299cc2d387d 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> >> > * Specialize ZONE_DEVICE memory into multiple types each having differents
> >> > * usage.
> >> > *
> >> > - * MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC:
> >> > + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT:
> >> > * Persistent device memory (pmem): struct page might be allocated in different
> >> > * memory and architecture might want to perform special actions. It is similar
> >> > * to regular memory, in that the CPU can access it transparently. However,
> >> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> >> > * include/linux/hmm.h and Documentation/vm/hmm.txt.
> >> > */
> >> > enum memory_type {
> >> > - MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC = 0,
> >> > + MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT = 0,
> >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > index b9baa6c07918..e82456c39a6a 100644
> >> > --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
> >> > }
> >> > pgmap->ref = ref;
> >> > pgmap->res = &page_map->res;
> >> > - pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
> >> > + pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT;
> >> > pgmap->page_fault = NULL;
> >> > pgmap->page_free = NULL;
> >> > pgmap->data = NULL;
> >>
> >> I think we need a different name. There's nothing "persistent" about
> >> the devm_memremap_pages() path. Why can't they share name, is the only
> >> difference coherence? I'm thinking something like:
> >>
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT /* persistent memory and coherent devices */
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_IO /* "public", but not coherent */
> >
> > No that would not work. Device public (in the context of this patchset)
> > is like device private ie device public page can be anywhere inside a
> > process address space either as anonymous memory page or as file back
> > page of regular filesystem (ie vma->ops is not pointing to anything
> > specific to the device memory).
> >
> > As such device public is different from how persistent memory is use
> > and those the cache coherency being the same between the two kind of
> > memory is not a discerning factor. So i need to distinguish between
> > persistent memory and device public memory.
> >
> > I believe keeping enum memory_type close to IORES_DESC naming is the
> > cleanest way to do that but i am open to other name suggestion.
> >
>
> The IORES_DESC has nothing to do with how the memory range is handled
> by the core mm. It sounds like the distinction this is trying to make
> is between MEMORY_DEVICE_{PUBLIC,PRIVATE} and MEMORY_DEVICE_HOST.
> Where a "host" memory range is one that does not need coordination
> with a specific device.
I want to distinguish between:
- device memory that is not accessible by the CPU
- device memory that is accessible by the CPU just like regular
memory
- existing user of devm_memremap_pages() which is persistent memory
(only pmem seems to call devm_memremap_pages()) that is use like a
filesystem or block device and thus isn't use like generic page in
a process address space
So if existing user of devm_memremap_pages() are only persistent memory
then it made sense to match the IORES_DESC we are expecting to see on
see such memory.
For public device memory (in the sense introduced by this patchset) i
do not know how it will be described by IORES_DESC. i think first folks
with it are IBM with CAPI and i am not sure they defined something for
that already.
I am open to any name beside public (well any reasonable name :)) but
i do need to be able to distinguish persistent memory as use today from
this device memory.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:49:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705184933.GD3305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hr+p+Bo8dcPfnW+O2q0KWvoM5z9LPZWhXLFJgE5ySojA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:15:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:49:18PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > Use consistent name between IORES_DESC and enum memory_type, rename
> >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC to MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT. This is to free up
> >> > the public name for CDM (cache coherent device memory) for which the
> >> > term public is a better match.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > include/linux/memremap.h | 4 ++--
> >> > kernel/memremap.c | 2 +-
> >> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > index 57546a07a558..2299cc2d387d 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> >> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> >> > * Specialize ZONE_DEVICE memory into multiple types each having differents
> >> > * usage.
> >> > *
> >> > - * MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC:
> >> > + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT:
> >> > * Persistent device memory (pmem): struct page might be allocated in different
> >> > * memory and architecture might want to perform special actions. It is similar
> >> > * to regular memory, in that the CPU can access it transparently. However,
> >> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
> >> > * include/linux/hmm.h and Documentation/vm/hmm.txt.
> >> > */
> >> > enum memory_type {
> >> > - MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC = 0,
> >> > + MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT = 0,
> >> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > index b9baa6c07918..e82456c39a6a 100644
> >> > --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
> >> > }
> >> > pgmap->ref = ref;
> >> > pgmap->res = &page_map->res;
> >> > - pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
> >> > + pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT;
> >> > pgmap->page_fault = NULL;
> >> > pgmap->page_free = NULL;
> >> > pgmap->data = NULL;
> >>
> >> I think we need a different name. There's nothing "persistent" about
> >> the devm_memremap_pages() path. Why can't they share name, is the only
> >> difference coherence? I'm thinking something like:
> >>
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT /* persistent memory and coherent devices */
> >> MEMORY_DEVICE_IO /* "public", but not coherent */
> >
> > No that would not work. Device public (in the context of this patchset)
> > is like device private ie device public page can be anywhere inside a
> > process address space either as anonymous memory page or as file back
> > page of regular filesystem (ie vma->ops is not pointing to anything
> > specific to the device memory).
> >
> > As such device public is different from how persistent memory is use
> > and those the cache coherency being the same between the two kind of
> > memory is not a discerning factor. So i need to distinguish between
> > persistent memory and device public memory.
> >
> > I believe keeping enum memory_type close to IORES_DESC naming is the
> > cleanest way to do that but i am open to other name suggestion.
> >
>
> The IORES_DESC has nothing to do with how the memory range is handled
> by the core mm. It sounds like the distinction this is trying to make
> is between MEMORY_DEVICE_{PUBLIC,PRIVATE} and MEMORY_DEVICE_HOST.
> Where a "host" memory range is one that does not need coordination
> with a specific device.
I want to distinguish between:
- device memory that is not accessible by the CPU
- device memory that is accessible by the CPU just like regular
memory
- existing user of devm_memremap_pages() which is persistent memory
(only pmem seems to call devm_memremap_pages()) that is use like a
filesystem or block device and thus isn't use like generic page in
a process address space
So if existing user of devm_memremap_pages() are only persistent memory
then it made sense to match the IORES_DESC we are expecting to see on
see such memory.
For public device memory (in the sense introduced by this patchset) i
do not know how it will be described by IORES_DESC. i think first folks
with it are IBM with CAPI and i am not sure they defined something for
that already.
I am open to any name beside public (well any reasonable name :)) but
i do need to be able to distinguish persistent memory as use today from
this device memory.
Cheers,
Jérôme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 21:14 [PATCH 0/5] Cache coherent device memory (CDM) with HMM v3 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 23:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-03 23:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 14:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-05 14:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-05 16:15 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 16:15 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 18:49 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2017-07-05 18:49 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 3:48 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 3:48 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 7:31 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-11 7:31 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-11 15:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 15:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 16:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-11 16:49 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/device-public-memory: device memory cache coherent with CPU v2 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-11 4:12 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 4:12 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 14:57 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 14:57 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-12 5:50 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-12 5:50 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/hmm: add new helper to hotplug CDM memory region Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-04 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-04 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-04 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170704125113.GC14727-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-05 3:18 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 3:18 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 3:18 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 6:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05 6:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05 6:38 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170705063813.GB10354-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-05 10:22 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 10:22 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 10:22 ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 14:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-05 14:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170710082805.GD19185-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170710160444.GB7071-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 16:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:25 ` Jerome Glisse
[not found] ` <20170710162542.GB4964-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 16:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 17:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 17:48 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170710174857.GF7071-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 18:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 18:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 18:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/memcontrol: support MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE and MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` Jérôme Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170705184933.GD3305@redhat.com \
--to=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dnellans@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.