All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: introduce memset support
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:17:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718164705.GY3053@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29d47cc4-f618-7253-6f59-41f10e7b4b87@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On 7/18/2017 12:19 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > 
> >> @@ -410,7 +410,40 @@ static int hidma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dmach)
> >>  		return NULL;
> >>  
> >>  	hidma_ll_set_transfer_params(mdma->lldev, mdesc->tre_ch,
> >> -				     src, dest, len, flags);
> >> +				     src, dest, len, flags,
> >> +				     HIDMA_TRE_MEMCPY);
> >> +
> >> +	/* Place descriptor in prepared list */
> >> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, irqflags);
> >> +	list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->prepared);
> >> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, irqflags);
> > 
> > This change looks suspicious, cna you clarify the need to do this?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Diff looks weird for some reason. I noticed that too.
> 
> I just added HIDMA_TRE_MEMCPY parameter to hidma_ll_set_transfer_params() function call
> from hidma_prep_dma_memcpy() and created a new hidma_prep_dma_memset() function very
> similar to memcpy with HIDMA_TRE_MEMSET call difference.
> 
> My suggestion is to use kdiff or another visual tool to look at the change.

ah fine then, let me take a look at it again with rested pair of eyes in the
morn :)

-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: introduce memset support
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:17:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718164705.GY3053@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29d47cc4-f618-7253-6f59-41f10e7b4b87@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On 7/18/2017 12:19 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > 
> >> @@ -410,7 +410,40 @@ static int hidma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dmach)
> >>  		return NULL;
> >>  
> >>  	hidma_ll_set_transfer_params(mdma->lldev, mdesc->tre_ch,
> >> -				     src, dest, len, flags);
> >> +				     src, dest, len, flags,
> >> +				     HIDMA_TRE_MEMCPY);
> >> +
> >> +	/* Place descriptor in prepared list */
> >> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, irqflags);
> >> +	list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->prepared);
> >> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, irqflags);
> > 
> > This change looks suspicious, cna you clarify the need to do this?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Diff looks weird for some reason. I noticed that too.
> 
> I just added HIDMA_TRE_MEMCPY parameter to hidma_ll_set_transfer_params() function call
> from hidma_prep_dma_memcpy() and created a new hidma_prep_dma_memset() function very
> similar to memcpy with HIDMA_TRE_MEMSET call difference.
> 
> My suggestion is to use kdiff or another visual tool to look at the change.

ah fine then, let me take a look at it again with rested pair of eyes in the
morn :)

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-30  2:30 [PATCH V3 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: introduce memset support Sinan Kaya
2017-06-30  2:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-06-30  2:30 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] dmaengine: dmatest: add support for memset test Sinan Kaya
2017-06-30  2:30   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 16:26   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-18 16:26     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-18 16:19 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: introduce memset support Vinod Koul
2017-07-18 16:19   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-18 16:26   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 16:26     ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 16:47     ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-07-18 16:47       ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-19  4:03       ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-19  4:03         ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170718164705.GY3053@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.