All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:20:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718192036.GB6173@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718142536.2306-1-paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:25:36PM +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> This adds the connector name when printing a debug message about the DP
> link training result. It is useful to figure out what connector is
> failing when multiple DP connectors are used.
>

Thanks for the patch, this does make sense during the link training
failure debugging to know the connector name.
While at it feel free to change "Failed", "Link Rate, Lane Count", to upper case
in the failure_handling case to be consistent with the pass case.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

Manasi

> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index b79c1c0e404c..05907fa8a553 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -321,12 +321,16 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
>  		goto failure_handling;
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane count = %d",
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane count = %d",
> +		      intel_connector->base.base.id,
> +		      intel_connector->base.name,
>  		      intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>  	return;
>  
>   failure_handling:
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> +		      intel_connector->base.base.id,
> +		      intel_connector->base.name,
>  		      intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>  	if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>  						     intel_dp->link_rate,
> -- 
> 2.13.2
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:20:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718192036.GB6173@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718142536.2306-1-paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:25:36PM +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> This adds the connector name when printing a debug message about the DP
> link training result. It is useful to figure out what connector is
> failing when multiple DP connectors are used.
>

Thanks for the patch, this does make sense during the link training
failure debugging to know the connector name.
While at it feel free to change "Failed", "Link Rate, Lane Count", to upper case
in the failure_handling case to be consistent with the pass case.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

Manasi

> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index b79c1c0e404c..05907fa8a553 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -321,12 +321,16 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
>  		goto failure_handling;
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane count = %d",
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane count = %d",
> +		      intel_connector->base.base.id,
> +		      intel_connector->base.name,
>  		      intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>  	return;
>  
>   failure_handling:
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> +		      intel_connector->base.base.id,
> +		      intel_connector->base.name,
>  		      intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>  	if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>  						     intel_dp->link_rate,
> -- 
> 2.13.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 14:25 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result Paul Kocialkowski
2017-07-18 14:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result (rev2) Patchwork
2017-07-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-18 18:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-18 19:20 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2017-07-18 19:20   ` Manasi Navare
2017-07-19  6:33   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-19  8:33   ` Paul Kocialkowski
2017-07-19  8:33     ` Paul Kocialkowski
2017-07-19  8:49     ` Jani Nikula
2017-07-19  8:49       ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170718192036.GB6173@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.