From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Remove bolted-SLB address limit for per-cpu stacks
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 01:33:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170813013346.14002-4-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170812113416.15978-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
Radix MMU does not take SLB or TLB interrupts when accessing kernel
linear address. Remove this restriction for radix mode.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
index af23d4b576ec..7393bac3c7f4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ static __init u64 safe_stack_limit(void)
/* Other BookE, we assume the first GB is bolted */
return 1ul << 30;
#else
+ if (early_radix_enabled())
+ return ULONG_MAX;
+
/* BookS, the first segment is bolted */
if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT))
return 1UL << SID_SHIFT_1T;
@@ -578,7 +581,8 @@ void __init irqstack_early_init(void)
/*
* Interrupt stacks must be in the first segment since we
- * cannot afford to take SLB misses on them.
+ * cannot afford to take SLB misses on them. They are not
+ * accessed in realmode.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
softirq_ctx[i] = (struct thread_info *)
@@ -649,8 +653,9 @@ void __init emergency_stack_init(void)
* aligned.
*
* Since we use these as temporary stacks during secondary CPU
- * bringup, we need to get at them in real mode. This means they
- * must also be within the RMO region.
+ * bringup, machine check, system reset, and HMI, we need to get
+ * at them in real mode. This means they must also be within the RMO
+ * region.
*
* The IRQ stacks allocated elsewhere in this file are zeroed and
* initialized in kernel/irq.c. These are initialized here in order
--
2.13.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Remove bolted-SLB address limit for per-cpu stacks
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:33:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170813013346.14002-4-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170812113416.15978-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
Radix MMU does not take SLB or TLB interrupts when accessing kernel
linear address. Remove this restriction for radix mode.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
index af23d4b576ec..7393bac3c7f4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ static __init u64 safe_stack_limit(void)
/* Other BookE, we assume the first GB is bolted */
return 1ul << 30;
#else
+ if (early_radix_enabled())
+ return ULONG_MAX;
+
/* BookS, the first segment is bolted */
if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT))
return 1UL << SID_SHIFT_1T;
@@ -578,7 +581,8 @@ void __init irqstack_early_init(void)
/*
* Interrupt stacks must be in the first segment since we
- * cannot afford to take SLB misses on them.
+ * cannot afford to take SLB misses on them. They are not
+ * accessed in realmode.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
softirq_ctx[i] = (struct thread_info *)
@@ -649,8 +653,9 @@ void __init emergency_stack_init(void)
* aligned.
*
* Since we use these as temporary stacks during secondary CPU
- * bringup, we need to get at them in real mode. This means they
- * must also be within the RMO region.
+ * bringup, machine check, system reset, and HMI, we need to get
+ * at them in real mode. This means they must also be within the RMO
+ * region.
*
* The IRQ stacks allocated elsewhere in this file are zeroed and
* initialized in kernel/irq.c. These are initialized here in order
--
2.13.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-13 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-12 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/9] improve early structure allocations (paca, lppaca, etc) Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-12 11:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix H_REGISTER_VPA VPA size validation Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 11:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-15 11:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 3:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-08-31 3:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] powerpc/powernv: powernv platform is not constrained by RMA Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2,2/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, 2/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/powernv: Remove real mode access limit for early allocations Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 12:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-14 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 14:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 14:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 13:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 13:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 12:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 12:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 12:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 12:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 13:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 13:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-09-12 10:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-09-12 10:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-09-12 10:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-09-12 10:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Remove bolted-SLB address limit for per-cpu stacks Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] powerpc/64s: Relax PACA address limitations Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Do not allocate SLB shadow structures Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2,6/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, 6/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] powerpc/64s: do not allocate lppaca if we are not virtualized Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-10-13 22:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-10-13 22:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-10-14 3:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-10-14 3:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of paca pointers and allocate pacas individually Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 15:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 15:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 17:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-15 17:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of lppaca pointers and allocate lppacas individually Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170813013346.14002-4-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.