From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of paca pointers and allocate pacas individually
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:50:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816015021.60c19579@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170813013346.14002-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:33:45 +1000
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Change the paca array into an array of pointers to pacas. Allocate
> pacas individually.
>
> This allows flexibility in where the PACAs are allocated. Future work
> will allocate them node-local. Platforms that don't have address limits
> on PACAs would be able to defer PACA allocations until later in boot
> rather than allocate all possible ones up-front then freeing unused.
>
> This is slightly more overhead (one additional indirection) for cross
> CPU paca references, but those aren't too common.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Incremental fix required for this. A !SMP typo bug, and pmac
init code that was not switched from paca array to paca_ptrs
array.
In the first case I just got rid of the r13 thing completely.
I think the idea of the code was to give secondaries a different
r13 so they wouldn't overwrite CPU0's paca if they accidentally
used it.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
index f71f468ebe7f..9db29719fc32 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -386,12 +386,11 @@ generic_secondary_common_init:
* physical cpu id in r24, we need to search the pacas to find
* which logical id maps to our physical one.
*/
- LOAD_REG_ADDR(r8, paca_ptrs) /* Load paca_ptrs pointe */
- ld r8,0(r8) /* Get base vaddr of array */
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- li r13,r13,0 /* kill r13 if used accidentally */
b kexec_wait /* wait for next kernel if !SMP */
#else
+ LOAD_REG_ADDR(r8, paca_ptrs) /* Load paca_ptrs pointe */
+ ld r8,0(r8) /* Get base vaddr of array */
LOAD_REG_ADDR(r7, nr_cpu_ids) /* Load nr_cpu_ids address */
lwz r7,0(r7) /* also the max paca allocated */
li r5,0 /* logical cpu id */
@@ -752,10 +751,10 @@ _GLOBAL(pmac_secondary_start)
mtmsrd r3 /* RI on */
/* Set up a paca value for this processor. */
- LOAD_REG_ADDR(r4,paca) /* Load paca pointer */
- ld r4,0(r4) /* Get base vaddr of paca array */
- mulli r13,r24,PACA_SIZE /* Calculate vaddr of right paca */
- add r13,r13,r4 /* for this processor. */
+ LOAD_REG_ADDR(r4,paca_ptrs) /* Load paca pointer */
+ ld r4,0(r4) /* Get base vaddr of paca_ptrs array */
+ sldi r5,r24,3 /* get paca_ptrs[] index from cpu id */
+ ldx r13,r4,r5 /* r13 = paca_ptrs[cpu id] */
SET_PACA(r13) /* Save vaddr of paca in an SPRG*/
/* Mark interrupts soft and hard disabled (they might be enabled
--
2.13.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of paca pointers and allocate pacas individually
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:50:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816015021.60c19579@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170813013346.14002-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:33:45 +1000
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Change the paca array into an array of pointers to pacas. Allocate
> pacas individually.
>
> This allows flexibility in where the PACAs are allocated. Future work
> will allocate them node-local. Platforms that don't have address limits
> on PACAs would be able to defer PACA allocations until later in boot
> rather than allocate all possible ones up-front then freeing unused.
>
> This is slightly more overhead (one additional indirection) for cross
> CPU paca references, but those aren't too common.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Incremental fix required for this. A !SMP typo bug, and pmac
init code that was not switched from paca array to paca_ptrs
array.
In the first case I just got rid of the r13 thing completely.
I think the idea of the code was to give secondaries a different
r13 so they wouldn't overwrite CPU0's paca if they accidentally
used it.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
index f71f468ebe7f..9db29719fc32 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -386,12 +386,11 @@ generic_secondary_common_init:
* physical cpu id in r24, we need to search the pacas to find
* which logical id maps to our physical one.
*/
- LOAD_REG_ADDR(r8, paca_ptrs) /* Load paca_ptrs pointe */
- ld r8,0(r8) /* Get base vaddr of array */
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- li r13,r13,0 /* kill r13 if used accidentally */
b kexec_wait /* wait for next kernel if !SMP */
#else
+ LOAD_REG_ADDR(r8, paca_ptrs) /* Load paca_ptrs pointe */
+ ld r8,0(r8) /* Get base vaddr of array */
LOAD_REG_ADDR(r7, nr_cpu_ids) /* Load nr_cpu_ids address */
lwz r7,0(r7) /* also the max paca allocated */
li r5,0 /* logical cpu id */
@@ -752,10 +751,10 @@ _GLOBAL(pmac_secondary_start)
mtmsrd r3 /* RI on */
/* Set up a paca value for this processor. */
- LOAD_REG_ADDR(r4,paca) /* Load paca pointer */
- ld r4,0(r4) /* Get base vaddr of paca array */
- mulli r13,r24,PACA_SIZE /* Calculate vaddr of right paca */
- add r13,r13,r4 /* for this processor. */
+ LOAD_REG_ADDR(r4,paca_ptrs) /* Load paca pointer */
+ ld r4,0(r4) /* Get base vaddr of paca_ptrs array */
+ sldi r5,r24,3 /* get paca_ptrs[] index from cpu id */
+ ldx r13,r4,r5 /* r13 = paca_ptrs[cpu id] */
SET_PACA(r13) /* Save vaddr of paca in an SPRG*/
/* Mark interrupts soft and hard disabled (they might be enabled
--
2.13.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-12 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/9] improve early structure allocations (paca, lppaca, etc) Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-12 11:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix H_REGISTER_VPA VPA size validation Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 11:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-15 11:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 3:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-08-31 3:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] powerpc/powernv: powernv platform is not constrained by RMA Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2,2/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, 2/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/powernv: Remove real mode access limit for early allocations Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 12:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-14 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 14:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 14:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-14 13:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-14 13:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 12:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 12:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 12:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 12:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-15 13:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 13:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-09-12 10:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-09-12 10:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-09-12 10:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-09-12 10:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Remove bolted-SLB address limit for per-cpu stacks Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] powerpc/64s: Relax PACA address limitations Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] powerpc/64s/radix: Do not allocate SLB shadow structures Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2,6/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-31 11:36 ` [v2, 6/9] " Michael Ellerman
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] powerpc/64s: do not allocate lppaca if we are not virtualized Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-10-13 22:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-10-13 22:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-10-14 3:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-10-14 3:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of paca pointers and allocate pacas individually Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 15:50 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-08-15 15:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-15 17:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-15 17:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-13 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] powerpc/64: Use a table of lppaca pointers and allocate lppacas individually Nicholas Piggin
2017-08-13 1:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170816015021.60c19579@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.