From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
dianders@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:28:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818182850.GG6008@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59972817.4030907@rock-chips.com>
* jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> [170818 11:05]:
> On 08/19/2017 01:01 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > BTW, in another context, Tony suggested we might need to fix up the IRQ flags
> > like this:
> >
> > int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> > {
> > ...
> > err = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handle_threaded_wake_irq,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), wirq);
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_get_trigger_type(irq), dev_name(dev), wirq);
> >
> > But IIUC, that's not actually necessary, because __setup_irq()
> > automatically configures the trigger type if the driver didn't request
> > one explicitly.
>
> actually this would not work...irq_get_trigger_type would return zero due to
> a bug which we have a patch for it already:
>
> 9908207 New [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Restore trigger settings in
> irq_modify_status()
Thanks for that information. So it seems we can leave out the
irq_get_trigger_type() here then? Might be worth checking
that it really does get populated though :)
> BTW, using dev_name for the name of this wake irq seems not very
> convenient...maybe add a ":wake" suffix?
Good idea, will take a look.
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:28:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818182850.GG6008@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59972817.4030907@rock-chips.com>
* jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> [170818 11:05]:
> On 08/19/2017 01:01 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > BTW, in another context, Tony suggested we might need to fix up the IRQ flags
> > like this:
> >
> > int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> > {
> > ...
> > err = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handle_threaded_wake_irq,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), wirq);
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_get_trigger_type(irq), dev_name(dev), wirq);
> >
> > But IIUC, that's not actually necessary, because __setup_irq()
> > automatically configures the trigger type if the driver didn't request
> > one explicitly.
>
> actually this would not work...irq_get_trigger_type would return zero due to
> a bug which we have a patch for it already:
>
> 9908207 New [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Restore trigger settings in
> irq_modify_status()
Thanks for that information. So it seems we can leave out the
irq_get_trigger_type() here then? Might be worth checking
that it really does get populated though :)
> BTW, using dev_name for the name of this wake irq seems not very
> convenient...maybe add a ":wake" suffix?
Good idea, will take a look.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:28:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818182850.GG6008@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59972817.4030907@rock-chips.com>
* jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> [170818 11:05]:
> On 08/19/2017 01:01 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > BTW, in another context, Tony suggested we might need to fix up the IRQ flags
> > like this:
> >
> > int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> > {
> > ...
> > err = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handle_threaded_wake_irq,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), wirq);
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_get_trigger_type(irq), dev_name(dev), wirq);
> >
> > But IIUC, that's not actually necessary, because __setup_irq()
> > automatically configures the trigger type if the driver didn't request
> > one explicitly.
>
> actually this would not work...irq_get_trigger_type would return zero due to
> a bug which we have a patch for it already:
>
> 9908207 New [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Restore trigger settings in
> irq_modify_status()
Thanks for that information. So it seems we can leave out the
irq_get_trigger_type() here then? Might be worth checking
that it really does get populated though :)
> BTW, using dev_name for the name of this wake irq seems not very
> convenient...maybe add a ":wake" suffix?
Good idea, will take a look.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-17 12:04 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIE_WAKE handling into rockchip pcie driver Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-18 7:23 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-18 7:23 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-18 7:23 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-18 8:32 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 8:32 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 8:32 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 17:01 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:01 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:01 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:07 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:07 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:07 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-18 17:47 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 17:47 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 17:47 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 18:28 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-08-18 18:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-18 18:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-18 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-18 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-18 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-18 20:05 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 20:05 ` jeffy
2017-08-18 20:05 ` jeffy
2017-08-22 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-22 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-22 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-23 1:32 ` jeffy
2017-08-23 1:32 ` jeffy
2017-08-23 1:57 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-23 1:57 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-23 1:57 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-23 2:16 ` jeffy
2017-08-23 2:16 ` jeffy
2017-08-23 2:16 ` jeffy
2017-12-19 0:48 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-19 0:48 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-19 0:48 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-20 19:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-12-20 19:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-12-22 23:20 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-22 23:20 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-22 23:20 ` Brian Norris
2017-12-23 16:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-12-23 16:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-12-23 16:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-08-17 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: " Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Handle pcie wake in pcie driver for Gru Jeffy Chen
2017-08-17 12:04 ` Jeffy Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818182850.GG6008@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.