All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Ping for perf patches
@ 2017-09-28  6:48 Thomas-Mich Richter
  2017-09-28 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas-Mich Richter @ 2017-09-28  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, linux-perf-use., Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Hendrik Brueckner, Martin Schwidefsky

Hi all,

I recently posted a few patches, which probably got lost in the meantime:

These 2 are for the perf test attr (now test 16):

- [PATCH 1/2] perf test attr: fix python error on empty result
- [PATCH 2/2] perf test attr: fix ignored test case result
Both have been ack'ed by Jiri.

The next 2 are s390x specific changes I submitted back in July/August but
need to be reverted and I submitted the reverting patches some week ago:

- [PATCH 1/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x
- [PATCH 2/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x part 2

I am not sure if they are still in the review process or if they
got lost? Should I resubmit them?

Apologies for the trouble.

Thanks.
-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM LTC Boeblingen Germany
--
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz 
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Ping for perf patches
  2017-09-28  6:48 Ping for perf patches Thomas-Mich Richter
@ 2017-09-28 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-09-28 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas-Mich Richter
  Cc: linux-perf-use., Jiri Olsa, Hendrik Brueckner, Martin Schwidefsky

Em Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> Hi all,
> 
> I recently posted a few patches, which probably got lost in the meantime:
> 
> These 2 are for the perf test attr (now test 16):
> 
> - [PATCH 1/2] perf test attr: fix python error on empty result
> - [PATCH 2/2] perf test attr: fix ignored test case result
> Both have been ack'ed by Jiri.
> 
> The next 2 are s390x specific changes I submitted back in July/August but
> need to be reverted and I submitted the reverting patches some week ago:
> 
> - [PATCH 1/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x
> - [PATCH 2/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x part 2
> 
> I am not sure if they are still in the review process or if they
> got lost? Should I resubmit them?

I'm procesing them now, sorry for the delay, I've been doing some other
activities, have a backlog of perf patches to review/test/process :-\

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-28 14:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-28  6:48 Ping for perf patches Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-09-28 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.