All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] nvme: ignore retries for multipath devices
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:53:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003115355.GB24650@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d603720-2f86-ab3c-6ba3-9d57afb3568e@suse.de>

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017@12:02:38PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >>  	if (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR)
> >>  		return false;
> >> -	if (nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
> >> +	if (nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries &&
> >> +	    !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH))
> >>  		return false;
> >>  	return true;
> > 
> > All failover logic is inside a nvme_req_needs_retry() conditional,
> > so this change looks completely broken - it basically disables
> > failover.
> > 
> Not in our tests.
> Without this patch we'd been seeing I/O errors during failover; with
> this patch I/O continues on the failover path.

http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/blob/refs/heads/nvme-mpath:/drivers/nvme/host/core.c#l208

210	if (unlikely(nvme_req(req)->status && nvme_req_needs_retry(req))) {
211		if (nvme_req_needs_failover(req)) {
212			nvme_failover_req(req);
213			return;
214		 }

The only call to nvme_failover_req is guarded by nvme_req_needs_retry,
and you change needs_retry to return true for MPATH requests that
exceed the number of retries.  I just don't see how we'd hit the
max_retries count, as each retry before should have already taken
nvme_req_needs_failover before.  What error code do you see this
with?  What kinds of device/setup?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-02 13:55 [PATCH 0/6] nvme: sanitize multipathing Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme: display 'CMIC' controller attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] nvme: use 'nvmsXnZ' instead of 'nvm-subXnZ' Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:20     ` Keith Busch
2017-10-11 14:32       ` Guan Junxiong
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] nvme: claim block devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:08     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  5:42         ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  6:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:33             ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  7:13               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  7:26                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05  1:08                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-05  6:51                   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-05 14:05                     ` Keith Busch
2017-10-05 14:39                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05 14:47                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] nvme: display 'NMIC' namespace attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:00     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 16:01         ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] nvme: Export subsystems to /sys/class/nvme-subsys Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:53     ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 16:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 17:15         ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: ignore retries for multipath devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:53       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-02 14:35 ` [PATCH] nvme: reset retires after path failover Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 14:43   ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 15:08     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 14:45   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 14:46   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171003115355.GB24650@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.