From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] nvme: claim block devices
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:13:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004071312.GA21143@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19dbdf11-86c4-b6ea-a18c-a78fcae822d5@suse.de>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017@08:33:07AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017@07:42:00AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> Hmm. Not sure how you would be doing that. Who should be doing the
> >> claiming? Typically the claim is done whenever a device is created on
> >> top of the other...
> >
> > We'd need a callback in the driver if it is claimed, and use that
> > to for propagating the claim, or use a shared struture to record the
> > claim. I haven't looked into the details yet, though.
> >
> >> What about an alternative plan: make creation of the subsystem device
> >> fully dynamic.
> >> But if a subsystem device is created it will always claim the underlying
> >> device. Then we can make the creation dependent on the NMIC attribute,
> >> and existing setups would not be affected.
> >
> > This doesn't work because a lot of devices can just set NMIC. E.g.
> > every namespace exported by the Linux NVMe target.
> >
> But as it's fully dynamic we can decide how to handle each device on a
> device-by-device basis, with a common default policy.
What do you mean with fully dynamic?
> My idea is to have a default policy (create/not create subsystem devices
> if NMIC is set) set via kernel command-line, and udev rules for devices
> requiring separate handling.
Yikes. That's exactly where I do _not_ want to go. No more arcane
magic setup that you need to be in the in group for to know like
dm-multipath. Things must just work, period.
The only other option I could think of would be to turn names around:
make /dev/nvmeX (chardev) and /dev/nvmeXnY the per-subsystem devices
that are multipathed if available. We'd then need new devices for the
invdividual controllers. With a little luck we'd get away with just
creating character devices. This would however create a problem for
dm-multipath users, which mostly is you and your paterners/customers.
Note that in general dm-multipath should continue working but it would
generally just see one path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 13:55 [PATCH 0/6] nvme: sanitize multipathing Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme: display 'CMIC' controller attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] nvme: use 'nvmsXnZ' instead of 'nvm-subXnZ' Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:20 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-11 14:32 ` Guan Junxiong
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] nvme: claim block devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04 5:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-04 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05 1:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-05 6:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-05 14:05 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-05 14:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] nvme: display 'NMIC' namespace attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 16:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] nvme: Export subsystems to /sys/class/nvme-subsys Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:53 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 17:15 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: ignore retries for multipath devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 14:35 ` [PATCH] nvme: reset retires after path failover Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 14:43 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 15:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 14:45 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 14:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004071312.GA21143@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.