All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marcelo.leitner@gmail.com (Marcelo Ricardo Leitner)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] selinux: Add SCTP support
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:16:15 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031171614.GE3675@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017135953.4419-1-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:59:53PM +0100, Richard Haines wrote:
> The SELinux SCTP implementation is explained in:
> Documentation/security/SELinux-sctp.txt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 33fd061..c3e9600 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
...
> @@ -4521,7 +4565,14 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
>  		unsigned short snum;
>  		u32 sid, perm;
>  
> -		if (sk->sk_family == PF_INET) {
> +		/* sctp_connectx(3) calls via
> +		 *selinux_sctp_bind_connect() that validates multiple
> +		 * connect addresses. Because of this need to check
> +		 * address->sa_family as it is possible to have
> +		 * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET.
> +		 */
> +		if (sk->sk_family == PF_INET ||
> +					address->sa_family == AF_INET) {

Not sure which code style applies on this file but the if () above
looks odd. At least, checkpatch.pl complained about it.

  Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] selinux: Add SCTP support
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:16:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031171614.GE3675@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017135953.4419-1-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:59:53PM +0100, Richard Haines wrote:
> The SELinux SCTP implementation is explained in:
> Documentation/security/SELinux-sctp.txt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 33fd061..c3e9600 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
...
> @@ -4521,7 +4565,14 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
>  		unsigned short snum;
>  		u32 sid, perm;
>  
> -		if (sk->sk_family = PF_INET) {
> +		/* sctp_connectx(3) calls via
> +		 *selinux_sctp_bind_connect() that validates multiple
> +		 * connect addresses. Because of this need to check
> +		 * address->sa_family as it is possible to have
> +		 * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET.
> +		 */
> +		if (sk->sk_family = PF_INET ||
> +					address->sa_family = AF_INET) {

Not sure which code style applies on this file but the if () above
looks odd. At least, checkpatch.pl complained about it.

  Marcelo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
	vyasevich@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
	eparis@parisplace.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] selinux: Add SCTP support
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:16:15 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031171614.GE3675@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017135953.4419-1-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:59:53PM +0100, Richard Haines wrote:
> The SELinux SCTP implementation is explained in:
> Documentation/security/SELinux-sctp.txt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 33fd061..c3e9600 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
...
> @@ -4521,7 +4565,14 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
>  		unsigned short snum;
>  		u32 sid, perm;
>  
> -		if (sk->sk_family == PF_INET) {
> +		/* sctp_connectx(3) calls via
> +		 *selinux_sctp_bind_connect() that validates multiple
> +		 * connect addresses. Because of this need to check
> +		 * address->sa_family as it is possible to have
> +		 * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET.
> +		 */
> +		if (sk->sk_family == PF_INET ||
> +					address->sa_family == AF_INET) {

Not sure which code style applies on this file but the if () above
looks odd. At least, checkpatch.pl complained about it.

  Marcelo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17 13:59 [RFC PATCH 5/5] selinux: Add SCTP support Richard Haines
2017-10-17 13:59 ` Richard Haines
2017-10-17 13:59 ` Richard Haines
2017-10-20 19:00 ` Stephen Smalley
2017-10-20 19:00   ` Stephen Smalley
2017-10-20 19:00   ` Stephen Smalley
2017-10-24 15:50   ` Richard Haines
2017-10-24 15:50     ` Richard Haines
2017-10-24 15:50     ` Richard Haines
2017-10-31 17:16 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2017-10-31 17:16   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-10-31 17:16   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-11-01 21:34   ` Richard Haines
2017-11-01 21:34     ` Richard Haines
2017-11-01 21:34     ` Richard Haines
2017-11-07  0:09 ` Paul Moore
2017-11-07  0:09   ` Paul Moore
2017-11-07  0:09   ` Paul Moore
2017-11-13 22:05   ` Richard Haines
2017-11-13 22:05     ` Richard Haines
2017-11-13 22:05     ` Richard Haines
2017-11-13 22:40     ` Paul Moore
2017-11-13 22:40       ` Paul Moore
2017-11-13 22:40       ` Paul Moore
2017-11-14 13:41       ` Stephen Smalley
2017-11-14 13:41         ` Stephen Smalley
2017-11-14 13:41         ` Stephen Smalley
2017-11-14 21:52       ` Richard Haines
2017-11-14 21:52         ` Richard Haines
2017-11-14 21:52         ` Richard Haines
2017-11-20 21:55         ` Paul Moore
2017-11-20 21:55           ` Paul Moore
2017-11-20 21:55           ` Paul Moore
2017-11-21 17:37           ` Richard Haines
2017-11-21 17:37             ` Richard Haines
2017-11-21 17:37             ` Richard Haines

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171031171614.GE3675@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.