From: Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong"
<darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, dax: unify IOMAP_F_DIRTY read vs write handling policy in the dax core
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:12:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171114041228.GA4094@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151062258598.8554.8157038002895095232.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:27:54PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index b43be199fbdf..888b60189983 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1087,9 +1087,9 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin(
> trace_xfs_iomap_found(ip, offset, length, 0, &imap);
> }
>
> - if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && xfs_ipincount(ip) &&
> - (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
> - iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> + if (xfs_ipincount(ip))
> + if (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP)
> + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
Please make a helper for this, and use it in xfs_file_fsync() where
the same dirty checks are done. e.g.
static inline bool
xfs_inode_need_fsync(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool datasync)
{
if (!xfs_ipincount(ip))
return false;
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip))
return false;
if (datasync &&
!(ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
return false;
return true;
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, dax: unify IOMAP_F_DIRTY read vs write handling policy in the dax core
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:12:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171114041228.GA4094@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151062258598.8554.8157038002895095232.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:27:54PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index b43be199fbdf..888b60189983 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1087,9 +1087,9 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin(
> trace_xfs_iomap_found(ip, offset, length, 0, &imap);
> }
>
> - if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && xfs_ipincount(ip) &&
> - (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
> - iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> + if (xfs_ipincount(ip))
> + if (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP)
> + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
Please make a helper for this, and use it in xfs_file_fsync() where
the same dirty checks are done. e.g.
static inline bool
xfs_inode_need_fsync(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool datasync)
{
if (!xfs_ipincount(ip))
return false;
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip))
return false;
if (datasync &&
!(ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
return false;
return true;
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, dax: unify IOMAP_F_DIRTY read vs write handling policy in the dax core
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:12:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171114041228.GA4094@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151062258598.8554.8157038002895095232.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:27:54PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index b43be199fbdf..888b60189983 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1087,9 +1087,9 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin(
> trace_xfs_iomap_found(ip, offset, length, 0, &imap);
> }
>
> - if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && xfs_ipincount(ip) &&
> - (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
> - iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> + if (xfs_ipincount(ip))
> + if (ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP)
> + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
Please make a helper for this, and use it in xfs_file_fsync() where
the same dirty checks are done. e.g.
static inline bool
xfs_inode_need_fsync(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool datasync)
{
if (!xfs_ipincount(ip))
return false;
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip))
return false;
if (datasync &&
!(ip->i_itemp->ili_fsync_fields & ~XFS_ILOG_TIMESTAMP))
return false;
return true;
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-14 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 1:27 [PATCH] fs, dax: unify IOMAP_F_DIRTY read vs write handling policy in the dax core Dan Williams
2017-11-14 1:27 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <151062258598.8554.8157038002895095232.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-14 2:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-14 2:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-14 2:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-14 4:12 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-11-14 4:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-14 4:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-14 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-14 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-14 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-14 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-14 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-14 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-14 9:31 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171114041228.GA4094@dastard \
--to=david-fqsqvqoi3ljby3ivrkzq2a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.