From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control code
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:12:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110131207.GL9706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110131010.GK9706@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:10:10PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> It's still incredibly faster to shutdown part of the CPU temporarily
> than to flush its internal state as a whole with IBPB. If it wouldn't
> be the case ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 special mode would perform
> better (but that's only enabled by default if SPEC_CTRL is not
> available and only IBPB_SUPPORT is).
Yet another bit of perhaps useful info: if you run 100% kernel
intensive computation (i.e. only interrupts on idle task or a kernel
driver doing all in kernel) ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 of course is
much faster than ibrs_enabled 1 ibpb_enabled 1. As long as you don't
have frequent ring change, ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 is faster.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 1:06 [patch RFC 0/5] x86/spectre_v2: Initial integration of IBRS into the spectre_v2 mechanics Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 1/5] x86/CPU: Sync CPU feature flags late Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:37 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 1:39 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 1:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10 11:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 12:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 2/5] x86/spectre: Simplify spectre code a bit Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 3/5] x86/spectre: Prepare for IBRS selection Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:51 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 4/5] x86/cpufeatures: Detect Speculation control feature Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 11:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control code Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 2:02 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 4:11 ` Justin Forbes
2018-01-10 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 9:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 11:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 11:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 11:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 11:58 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:12 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:42 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 12:09 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:29 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-10 12:51 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2018-01-10 12:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:07 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:45 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:53 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 21:35 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-10 22:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 13:51 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 13:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 13:58 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 14:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 14:14 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 14:59 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 15:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 15:24 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 15:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 15:56 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:10 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110131207.GL9706@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.