arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

[Michael Weiser]

Hello Catalin and Will,

I'd like ask your opinion as arm64 Linux port maintainers and initial
authors of the code in question regarding kernel messages on
unimplemented system calls. I apologise in advance if that isn't the
right approach (and Cc: linux-arm :).

Currently, a programm doing an unimplemented syscall triggers a rather
scary looking kernel message:

[  189.143682] glibc-test[2118]: syscall 1000
[  189.143728] Code: aa0503e4 aa0603e5 aa0703e6 d4000001 (b13ffc1f) 
[  189.143750] CPU: 1 PID: 2118 Comm: glibc-test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-00232-g2c1cfa499018 #3
[  189.143755] Hardware name: SoPine with baseboard (DT)
[  189.143762] pstate: 80000000 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
[  189.143774] pc : 0xffffb8fb0104
[  189.143779] lr : 0xaaaab43c563c
[  189.143781] sp : 0000ffffd4fa1180
[  189.143786] x29: 0000ffffd4fa1190 x28: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143795] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143802] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143809] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143816] x21: 0000aaaab43c564c x20: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143823] x19: 0000aaaab43c5770 x18: 0000000000000a03 
[  189.143829] x17: 0000aaaab43d6020 x16: 0000ffffb8fb00e0 
[  189.143837] x15: 0000ffffb8ed4000 x14: 0000ffffb8ed7540 
[  189.143844] x13: 0000ffffb8ee45d8 x12: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143851] x11: 0000000000000020 x10: 0000000000000000 
[  189.143857] x9 : 00000000000000ff x8 : 00000000000003e8 
[  189.143864] x7 : e607cc2262a01600 x6 : e607cc2262a01600 
[  189.143872] x5 : 0000ffffd4fa12c0 x4 : 0000000000000000 
[  189.143879] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000aaaab43c5630 
[  189.143886] x1 : 0000ffffd4fa12d8 x0 : 0000ffffd4fa12c8 

It requires some digging to find that this basically is a
debugging/warning message and can be disabled using
/proc/sys/debug/exception-trace
(arm64/kernel/traps.c:do_ni_syscall,show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited).

Other platforms do not seem to do this, even with exception-trace
enabled - x86_64 and arm for sure. Instead they silently return -ENOSYS.

There are a number of other kernel messages governed by the same sysctl
(fault.c:__do_user_fault,do_sp_pc_abort, traps.c:force_signal_inject,
signal.c:sys_rt_sigreturn).

Can I in good conscience disable exception-trace on the affected
(production) systems or would this mask other, more critical
misbehaviour?

Is it actually considered misbehaviour for arm64 userland to even
attempt such a call? Or is the message maybe just a left-over development
aid?

Can it perhaps be removed or disabled by default, considering that with
future addition of syscalls userland will likely start triggering this
message a lot when run on older kernels?
-- 
Thanks,
Michael

arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

[Will Deacon]

Hi Michael,

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:44:01PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote:
> I'd like ask your opinion as arm64 Linux port maintainers and initial
> authors of the code in question regarding kernel messages on
> unimplemented system calls. I apologise in advance if that isn't the
> right approach (and Cc: linux-arm :).
> 
> Currently, a programm doing an unimplemented syscall triggers a rather
> scary looking kernel message:
> 
> [  189.143682] glibc-test[2118]: syscall 1000
> [  189.143728] Code: aa0503e4 aa0603e5 aa0703e6 d4000001 (b13ffc1f) 
> [  189.143750] CPU: 1 PID: 2118 Comm: glibc-test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-00232-g2c1cfa499018 #3
> [  189.143755] Hardware name: SoPine with baseboard (DT)
> [  189.143762] pstate: 80000000 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
> [  189.143774] pc : 0xffffb8fb0104
> [  189.143779] lr : 0xaaaab43c563c
> [  189.143781] sp : 0000ffffd4fa1180
> [  189.143786] x29: 0000ffffd4fa1190 x28: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143795] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143802] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143809] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143816] x21: 0000aaaab43c564c x20: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143823] x19: 0000aaaab43c5770 x18: 0000000000000a03 
> [  189.143829] x17: 0000aaaab43d6020 x16: 0000ffffb8fb00e0 
> [  189.143837] x15: 0000ffffb8ed4000 x14: 0000ffffb8ed7540 
> [  189.143844] x13: 0000ffffb8ee45d8 x12: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143851] x11: 0000000000000020 x10: 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143857] x9 : 00000000000000ff x8 : 00000000000003e8 
> [  189.143864] x7 : e607cc2262a01600 x6 : e607cc2262a01600 
> [  189.143872] x5 : 0000ffffd4fa12c0 x4 : 0000000000000000 
> [  189.143879] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000aaaab43c5630 
> [  189.143886] x1 : 0000ffffd4fa12d8 x0 : 0000ffffd4fa12c8 
> 
> It requires some digging to find that this basically is a
> debugging/warning message and can be disabled using
> /proc/sys/debug/exception-trace
> (arm64/kernel/traps.c:do_ni_syscall,show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited).
> 
> Other platforms do not seem to do this, even with exception-trace
> enabled - x86_64 and arm for sure. Instead they silently return -ENOSYS.
> 
> There are a number of other kernel messages governed by the same sysctl
> (fault.c:__do_user_fault,do_sp_pc_abort, traps.c:force_signal_inject,
> signal.c:sys_rt_sigreturn).
> 
> Can I in good conscience disable exception-trace on the affected
> (production) systems or would this mask other, more critical
> misbehaviour?
> 
> Is it actually considered misbehaviour for arm64 userland to even
> attempt such a call? Or is the message maybe just a left-over development
> aid?
> 
> Can it perhaps be removed or disabled by default, considering that with
> future addition of syscalls userland will likely start triggering this
> message a lot when run on older kernels?

I agree that printing this stuff is bogus. We should instead just return
-ENOSYS via a redirect to sys_ni_syscall. The only corner case is for the
compat private syscalls, where we should match 32-bit and dispatch SIGILL
for that range (and then probably print the warning based on
show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited because there's a signal involved).

Will

[PATCH 0/2] arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

[Michael Weiser]

Hi Will,

I'm not pretending to fully understand the semantics of what I've done
but I've tried to make a start on implementing both changes anyway.

The first is straightforward in dropping the offending log message from
do_ni_syscall().

The second mirrors arm behaviour in compat_arm_syscall() in raising
SIGILL for (most) unimplemented syscalls. I've intentionally kept the
arm message format in case anyone has a script filtering for it.

Syncing __dump_instr() with arm to support thumb instructions was done
on the assumption that arm-eabi code may obviously contain thumb
instructions.

Both are compile-tested as well as manually prodded with some randomly
chosen syscall numbers from aarch64 and arm-eabi binaries while running
under qemu-system-aarch64.

Thanks,
Michael

Michael Weiser (2):
  arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message
  arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls

 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c       | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c            | 22 ++++++++++------------
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.16.0

[PATCH 1/2] arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message

[Michael Weiser]

Stop printing a (ratelimited) kernel message for each instance of an
unimplemented syscall being called. Userland making an unimplemented
syscall is not necessarily misbehaviour and to be expected with a
current userland running on an older kernel. Also, the current message
looks scary to users but does not actually indicate a real problem nor
help them narrow down the cause. Just rely on sys_ni_syscall() to return
-ENOSYS.

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index bbb0fde2780e..0ef28b7f6aa7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -526,14 +526,6 @@ asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) {
-		pr_info("%s[%d]: syscall %d\n", current->comm,
-			task_pid_nr(current), regs->syscallno);
-		dump_instr("", regs);
-		if (user_mode(regs))
-			__show_regs(regs);
-	}
-
 	return sys_ni_syscall();
 }
 
-- 
2.16.0

[PATCH 2/2] arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls

[Michael Weiser]

Mirror arm behaviour for unimplemented syscalls: Below 2048 return
-ENOSYS. Above 2048 raise SIGILL and print a ratelimited message with
details. dump_instr() is made non-static and added to system_misc.h so
it can be used in compat_arm_syscall(). Also it is synced with the arm
implementation to support thumb instructions.

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c       | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c            | 14 ++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 07aa8e3c5630..0f73b6c1ca63 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
 struct mm_struct;
 extern void show_pte(unsigned long addr);
 extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
+extern void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
index 8b8bbd3eaa52..3a5b3809b671 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/system_misc.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 
 static long
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags)
  */
 long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	siginfo_t info;
 	unsigned int no = regs->regs[7];
 
 	switch (no) {
@@ -99,6 +101,31 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return 0;
 
 	default:
-		return -ENOSYS;
+		/*
+		 * Calls 9f00xx..9f07ff are defined to return -ENOSYS
+		 * if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This
+		 * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
+		 * a feature is supported.
+		 */
+		if ((no & 0xffff) <= 0x7ff)
+			return -ENOSYS;
+		break;
 	}
+
+	if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) {
+		pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n",
+		       task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no);
+		dump_instr("", regs);
+		if (user_mode(regs))
+			__show_regs(regs);
+	}
+
+	info.si_signo = SIGILL;
+	info.si_errno = 0;
+	info.si_code  = ILL_ILLTRP;
+	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs) -
+			 (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4);
+
+	arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad syscall(2)", regs, &info, no);
+	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 0ef28b7f6aa7..2ee511243140 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -67,16 +67,22 @@ static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where)
 static void __dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
+	const int thumb = compat_thumb_mode(regs);
+	const int width = thumb ? 4 : 8;
 	char str[sizeof("00000000 ") * 5 + 2 + 1], *p = str;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = -4; i < 1; i++) {
+	for (i = -4; i < 1 + !!thumb; i++) {
 		unsigned int val, bad;
 
-		bad = get_user(val, &((u32 *)addr)[i]);
+		if (thumb)
+			bad = get_user(val, &((u16 *)addr)[i]);
+		else
+			bad = get_user(val, &((u32 *)addr)[i]);
 
 		if (!bad)
-			p += sprintf(p, i == 0 ? "(%08x) " : "%08x ", val);
+			p += sprintf(p, i == 0 ? "(%0*x) " : "%0*x ",
+					width, val);
 		else {
 			p += sprintf(p, "bad PC value");
 			break;
@@ -85,7 +91,7 @@ static void __dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	printk("%sCode: %s\n", lvl, str);
 }
 
-static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
+void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		mm_segment_t fs = get_fs();
-- 
2.16.0

[PATCH 2/2] arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls

[Will Deacon]

Hi Michael,

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:20:26PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote:
> Mirror arm behaviour for unimplemented syscalls: Below 2048 return
> -ENOSYS. Above 2048 raise SIGILL and print a ratelimited message with
> details. dump_instr() is made non-static and added to system_misc.h so
> it can be used in compat_arm_syscall(). Also it is synced with the arm
> implementation to support thumb instructions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c       | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c            | 14 ++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index 07aa8e3c5630..0f73b6c1ca63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
>  struct mm_struct;
>  extern void show_pte(unsigned long addr);
>  extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
> +extern void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  
>  extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> index 8b8bbd3eaa52..3a5b3809b671 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  #include <asm/unistd.h>
>  
>  static long
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags)
>   */
>  long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	siginfo_t info;
>  	unsigned int no = regs->regs[7];
>  
>  	switch (no) {
> @@ -99,6 +101,31 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	default:
> -		return -ENOSYS;
> +		/*
> +		 * Calls 9f00xx..9f07ff are defined to return -ENOSYS
> +		 * if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This
> +		 * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
> +		 * a feature is supported.
> +		 */
> +		if ((no & 0xffff) <= 0x7ff)
> +			return -ENOSYS;
> +		break;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) {
> +		pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n",
> +		       task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no);
> +		dump_instr("", regs);
> +		if (user_mode(regs))
> +			__show_regs(regs);
> +	}
> +
> +	info.si_signo = SIGILL;
> +	info.si_errno = 0;
> +	info.si_code  = ILL_ILLTRP;
> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs) -
> +			 (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4);
> +
> +	arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad syscall(2)", regs, &info, no);
> +	return 0;

Whilst I think it's worth mirroring the SIGILL behaviour here, I don't think
we need to both with the show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited() hunk. It's
predicated on CONFI_DEBUG_USER for arch/arm/ anyway, so it's something that
can be relied upon but really more of a debug aid that we can live without
for now.

So I'd suggest simply dropping that hunk and the changes to __dump_instr.

Cheers,

Will

[PATCH 1/2] arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message

[Will Deacon]

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:20:25PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote:
> Stop printing a (ratelimited) kernel message for each instance of an
> unimplemented syscall being called. Userland making an unimplemented
> syscall is not necessarily misbehaviour and to be expected with a
> current userland running on an older kernel. Also, the current message
> looks scary to users but does not actually indicate a real problem nor
> help them narrow down the cause. Just rely on sys_ni_syscall() to return
> -ENOSYS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index bbb0fde2780e..0ef28b7f6aa7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -526,14 +526,6 @@ asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> -	if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) {
> -		pr_info("%s[%d]: syscall %d\n", current->comm,
> -			task_pid_nr(current), regs->syscallno);
> -		dump_instr("", regs);
> -		if (user_mode(regs))
> -			__show_regs(regs);
> -	}
> -
>  	return sys_ni_syscall();
>  }

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

I'm also strongly inclined to change the default value of
show_unhandled_signals to be zero. I find it odd that it defaults to 1
when it can be changed via proc anyway, although this is consistent with
other architectures.

Will

[PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

[Michael Weiser]

Hi Will,

I've dropped the message from the compat change, which makes it much
more straight-forward. We are still dropping the offending log message
from do_ni_syscall(). The second change now just mirrors the part of arm
behaviour in compat_arm_syscall() that raises SIGILL for (most)
unimplemented syscalls. Finally show_unhandled_signals is disabled by
default.

All are compile-tested as well as manually prodded with some randomly
chosen syscall numbers from aarch64 and arm-eabi binaries while running
under qemu-system-aarch64. New show_unhandled_signals defaults and
enabling via /proc/sys have been tested with a minimal segfaulting test
program.

Thanks,
Michael

Michael Weiser (3):
  arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message
  arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls
  arm64: Disable unhandled signal log messages by default

v2:
- drop message printing from compat syscall handling

 arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c      | 10 +---------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.16.1

[PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message

[Michael Weiser]

Stop printing a (ratelimited) kernel message for each instance of an
unimplemented syscall being called. Userland making an unimplemented
syscall is not necessarily misbehaviour and to be expected with a
current userland running on an older kernel. Also, the current message
looks scary to users but does not actually indicate a real problem nor
help them narrow down the cause. Just rely on sys_ni_syscall() to return
-ENOSYS.

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index bbb0fde2780e..0ef28b7f6aa7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -526,14 +526,6 @@ asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) {
-		pr_info("%s[%d]: syscall %d\n", current->comm,
-			task_pid_nr(current), regs->syscallno);
-		dump_instr("", regs);
-		if (user_mode(regs))
-			__show_regs(regs);
-	}
-
 	return sys_ni_syscall();
 }
 
-- 
2.16.1

[PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls

[Michael Weiser]

Mirror arm behaviour for unimplemented syscalls: Below 2048 return
-ENOSYS, above 2048 raise SIGILL.

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
index 8b8bbd3eaa52..4d5dfbb2c4cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/system_misc.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 
 static long
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags)
  */
 long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	siginfo_t info;
 	unsigned int no = regs->regs[7];
 
 	switch (no) {
@@ -99,6 +101,23 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return 0;
 
 	default:
-		return -ENOSYS;
+		/*
+		 * Calls 9f00xx..9f07ff are defined to return -ENOSYS
+		 * if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This
+		 * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
+		 * a feature is supported.
+		 */
+		if ((no & 0xffff) <= 0x7ff)
+			return -ENOSYS;
+		break;
 	}
+
+	info.si_signo = SIGILL;
+	info.si_errno = 0;
+	info.si_code  = ILL_ILLTRP;
+	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs) -
+			 (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4);
+
+	arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad syscall(2)", regs, &info, no);
+	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.16.1

[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: Disable unhandled signal log messages by default

[Michael Weiser]

aarch64 unhandled signal kernel messages are very verbose, suggesting
them to be more of a debugging aid:

sigsegv[33]: unhandled level 2 translation fault (11) at 0x00000000, esr
0x92000046, in sigsegv[400000+71000]
CPU: 1 PID: 33 Comm: sigsegv Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc3+ #3
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 60000000 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : 0x4003f4
lr : 0x4006bc
sp : 0000fffffe94a060
x29: 0000fffffe94a070 x28: 0000000000000000
x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 00000000004001b0
x23: 0000000000486ac8 x22: 00000000004001c8
x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000400be8
x19: 0000000000400b30 x18: 0000000000484728
x17: 000000000865ffc8 x16: 000000000000270f
x15: 00000000000000b0 x14: 0000000000000002
x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0008000020008008
x9 : 000000000000000f x8 : ffffffffffffffff
x7 : 0004000000000000 x6 : ffffffffffffffff
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
x3 : 00000000004003e4 x2 : 0000fffffe94a1e8
x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000000

Disable them by default, so they can be enabled using
/proc/sys/debug/exception-trace.

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 0ef28b7f6aa7..eb2d15147e8d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static const char *handler[]= {
 	"Error"
 };
 
-int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
+int show_unhandled_signals = 0;
 
 static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where)
 {
-- 
2.16.1

[PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Unimplemented syscall kernel message

[Will Deacon]

Hi Michael,

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote:
> I've dropped the message from the compat change, which makes it much
> more straight-forward. We are still dropping the offending log message
> from do_ni_syscall(). The second change now just mirrors the part of arm
> behaviour in compat_arm_syscall() that raises SIGILL for (most)
> unimplemented syscalls. Finally show_unhandled_signals is disabled by
> default.
> 
> All are compile-tested as well as manually prodded with some randomly
> chosen syscall numbers from aarch64 and arm-eabi binaries while running
> under qemu-system-aarch64. New show_unhandled_signals defaults and
> enabling via /proc/sys have been tested with a minimal segfaulting test
> program.

Thanks, I'll pick these up for 4.17.

Will