All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel <letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>
Subject: usb: musb: fix enumeration after resume
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:37:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207203700.GC3992@uda0271908> (raw)

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:00:24PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:46:05 -0600
> Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 09:34:03AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > On dm3730 there are enumeration problems after resume.
> > > Investigation led to the cause that the MUSB_POWER_SOFTCONN
> > > bit is not set. If it was set before suspend (because it
> > > was enabled via musb_pullup()), it is set in
> > > musb_restore_context() so the pullup is enabled. But then
> > > musb_start() is called which overwrites MUSB_POWER and
> > > therefore disables MUSB_POWER_SOFTCONN, so no pullup is
> > > enabled and the device is not enumerated.  
> >  
> > Do you see the issue with the v4.15?
> > 
> Yes. Tested without other patches. 
> It was also there in earlier kernels but I had not had motivation enough
> to debug.

Applied to my tree. Thanks.

> So maybe it deserves a CC: Stable

I would prefer it is first tested on each stable tree.

> > > So let's do a subset of what musb_start() does
> > > in the same way as musb_suspend() does it. Platform-specific
> > > stuff it still called as there might be some phy-related stuff
> > > which needs to be enabled.
> > > Also interrupts are enabled, as it was the original idea
> > > of calling musb_start() in musb_resume() according to
> > > Commit 6fc6f4b87cb3 ("usb: musb: Disable interrupts on suspend,
> > > enable them on resume")  
> > 
> > The logic in the fix makes sense, and I do see the same problem with
> > AM335x on v4.9 kernel, but it doesn't happen on v4.15. I haven't checked
> > if there is anything after musb_start() which sets MUSB_POWER_SOFTCON
> > bit.

On v4.15, the SESSION bit is set later which sets the SOFTCON bit. I
didn't check how come v4.9 doesn't invoke it though.

Regards,
-Bin.
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel <letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: fix enumeration after resume
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:37:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207203700.GC3992@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206200024.18d40735@aktux>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:00:24PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:46:05 -0600
> Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 09:34:03AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > On dm3730 there are enumeration problems after resume.
> > > Investigation led to the cause that the MUSB_POWER_SOFTCONN
> > > bit is not set. If it was set before suspend (because it
> > > was enabled via musb_pullup()), it is set in
> > > musb_restore_context() so the pullup is enabled. But then
> > > musb_start() is called which overwrites MUSB_POWER and
> > > therefore disables MUSB_POWER_SOFTCONN, so no pullup is
> > > enabled and the device is not enumerated.  
> >  
> > Do you see the issue with the v4.15?
> > 
> Yes. Tested without other patches. 
> It was also there in earlier kernels but I had not had motivation enough
> to debug.

Applied to my tree. Thanks.

> So maybe it deserves a CC: Stable

I would prefer it is first tested on each stable tree.

> > > So let's do a subset of what musb_start() does
> > > in the same way as musb_suspend() does it. Platform-specific
> > > stuff it still called as there might be some phy-related stuff
> > > which needs to be enabled.
> > > Also interrupts are enabled, as it was the original idea
> > > of calling musb_start() in musb_resume() according to
> > > Commit 6fc6f4b87cb3 ("usb: musb: Disable interrupts on suspend,
> > > enable them on resume")  
> > 
> > The logic in the fix makes sense, and I do see the same problem with
> > AM335x on v4.9 kernel, but it doesn't happen on v4.15. I haven't checked
> > if there is anything after musb_start() which sets MUSB_POWER_SOFTCON
> > bit.

On v4.15, the SESSION bit is set later which sets the SOFTCON bit. I
didn't check how come v4.9 doesn't invoke it though.

Regards,
-Bin.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 20:37 Bin Liu [this message]
2018-02-07 20:37 ` [PATCH] usb: musb: fix enumeration after resume Bin Liu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-16  7:10 Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-16  7:10 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-06 19:00 Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-06 19:00 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-06 18:46 Bin Liu
2018-02-06 18:46 ` [PATCH] " Bin Liu
2018-01-27  8:34 Andreas Kemnade
2018-01-27  8:34 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Kemnade
     [not found] ` <20180127083403.928-1-andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-06 18:47   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-02-06 18:47     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-02-06 18:47     ` Tony Lindgren
     [not found]     ` <20180206184725.GD21573-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-06 19:09       ` [PATCH] " Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-06 19:09         ` Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-06 19:09         ` Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-07 20:32     ` [PATCH] " Bin Liu
2018-02-07 20:32       ` Bin Liu
2018-02-07 20:32       ` Bin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207203700.GC3992@uda0271908 \
    --to=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.