From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux NVMe <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: Remove unused queue parameter
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:48:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326144809.GN12909@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180326014706.GC9828@ming.t460p>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 09:47:07AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > @@ -1629,9 +1627,7 @@ static int nvme_create_io_queues(struct nvme_dev *dev)
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > for (i = dev->ctrl.queue_count; i <= dev->max_qid; i++) {
> > - /* vector == qid - 1, match nvme_create_queue */
> > - if (nvme_alloc_queue(dev, i, dev->q_depth,
> > - pci_irq_get_node(to_pci_dev(dev->dev), i - 1))) {
> > + if (nvme_alloc_queue(dev, i, dev->q_depth)) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > break;
> > }
>
> nvme_create_io_queues() is called after pci_alloc_irq_vectors() returns,
> and the above pci_irq_get_node() should return the correct node info,
> right?
Right, the return is correct. It's just not being used anymore.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: Remove unused queue parameter
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:48:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326144809.GN12909@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180326014706.GC9828@ming.t460p>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018@09:47:07AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018@04:19:22PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > @@ -1629,9 +1627,7 @@ static int nvme_create_io_queues(struct nvme_dev *dev)
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > for (i = dev->ctrl.queue_count; i <= dev->max_qid; i++) {
> > - /* vector == qid - 1, match nvme_create_queue */
> > - if (nvme_alloc_queue(dev, i, dev->q_depth,
> > - pci_irq_get_node(to_pci_dev(dev->dev), i - 1))) {
> > + if (nvme_alloc_queue(dev, i, dev->q_depth)) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > break;
> > }
>
> nvme_create_io_queues() is called after pci_alloc_irq_vectors() returns,
> and the above pci_irq_get_node() should return the correct node info,
> right?
Right, the return is correct. It's just not being used anymore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-23 22:19 [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Allow PCI vector offset for mapping queues Keith Busch
2018-03-23 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-23 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: Remove unused queue parameter Keith Busch
2018-03-23 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-26 1:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-26 1:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-26 14:48 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-03-26 14:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-23 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: Separate IO and admin queue IRQ vectors Keith Busch
2018-03-23 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-27 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-27 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-24 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Allow PCI vector offset for mapping queues jianchao.wang
2018-03-24 13:55 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-26 19:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-26 19:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-26 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-26 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-26 19:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-26 19:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-27 15:39 Keith Busch
2018-03-27 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: Remove unused queue parameter Keith Busch
2018-03-27 15:39 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-28 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-28 1:27 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180326144809.GN12909@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.