From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:47:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409164737.GE3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180409052038.5391-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Hey, Bart.
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:20:38PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If a completion occurs after blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset
> rq->aborted_gstate and the request is again in flight when the timeout
> expires then a request will be completed twice: a first time by the
> timeout handler and a second time when the regular completion occurs.
Are we still talking about the same BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER case? This can
be solved by the two patches which rcu-synchronizes the hand-over to
normal completion path, right?
> Additionally, the blk-mq timeout handling code ignores completions that
> occur after blk_mq_check_expired() has been called and before
> blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset rq->aborted_gstate. If a block driver
> timeout handler always returns BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER then the result will
> be that the request never terminates.
And this is the same race window which was always there, right? I
really don't think reducing or closing this window requires full
synchronization.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 5:20 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 8:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:42 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-09 16:49 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-09 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-04-09 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 18:56 ` tj
2018-04-09 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 21:40 ` tj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-10 15:37 Alex G.
2018-04-10 15:37 ` Alex G.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180409164737.GE3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.