From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"maxg@mellanox.com" <maxg@mellanox.com>,
"israelr@mellanox.com" <israelr@mellanox.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:56:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409185616.GG3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e32290f8d5901fbd16116d1623d37dbfdc1e1b8.camel@wdc.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:03:05PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> My opinion is not only that the two patches that you posted recently do not
> fix all the races that are fixed by this patch but also that the races that
The race was with the path where the ownership of a timed out request
is passed back to normal completion path and those two patches fix
that, right?
> exist today in the blk-mq timeout handling code cannot be fixed completely
> using RCU only.
I really don't think that is that complicated. Let's first confirm
the race fix and get to narrowing / closing that window.
> That race window did not exist in the legacy block layer. I don't think
IIRC, it did. It was there when I first started working on libata EH
years ago.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 5:20 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 8:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:42 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-09 16:49 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-09 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-09 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 18:56 ` tj [this message]
2018-04-09 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 21:40 ` tj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-10 15:37 Alex G.
2018-04-10 15:37 ` Alex G.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180409185616.GG3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.