All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	"Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com,
	"KY Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	"Patrik Jakobsson" <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Jon Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
	"Chris Zankel" <chris@zankel.net>,
	"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"kbuild test robot" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:09:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705100939.GD1225@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfWLcQq4XGM3RyfO_ENx=3=WrCEhtOw+a0Sfwz_OpQ0UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/04/18 at 07:46pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > reparent_resources() is duplicated in arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > and arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, so move it to kernel/resource.c
> > so that it's shared.
> 
> With couple of comments below,

Sure, will fix these and repost with your reviewed-by, thanks. Should be
after I reproduce and fix those issues reported by test robot.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> 
> P.S. In some commit message in this series you used 'likt' instead of 'like'.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 37 -------------------------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 35 -----------------------------------
> >  include/linux/ioport.h           |  1 +
> >  kernel/resource.c                | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > index f34346d56095..7899bafab064 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > @@ -619,43 +619,6 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int __init reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s [%llx..%llx] under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->start,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->end, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > index fe9733ffffaa..926035bb378d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > @@ -1088,41 +1088,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > index da0ebaec25f0..dfdcd0bfe54e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> >  struct resource *lookup_resource(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start);
> >  int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >                     resource_size_t size);
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res);
> >  resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res);
> >  static inline resource_size_t resource_size(const struct resource *res)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> > index 30e1bc68503b..d1cbf4b50e17 100644
> > --- a/kernel/resource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> > @@ -983,6 +983,45 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_resource);
> >
> > +/*
> 
> /** ?
> 
> > + * reparent_resources - reparent resource children of parent that res covers
> > + * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> > + * @res: resource descriptor desired by caller
> > + *
> > + * Reparent resource children of 'parent' that conflict with 'res'
> > + * under 'res', and make 'res' replace those children.
> 
> Describe error codes, please.
> 
> > + */
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > +       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > +
> > +       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > +               if (p->end < res->start)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (res->end < p->start)
> > +                       break;
> > +               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > +                       return -ENOTSUPP;       /* not completely contained */
> > +               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +                       firstpp = pp;
> > +       }
> > +       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +               return -ECANCELED; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > +       res->parent = parent;
> > +       res->child = *firstpp;
> > +       res->sibling = *pp;
> > +       *firstpp = res;
> > +       *pp = NULL;
> > +       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > +               p->parent = res;
> > +               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > +                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reparent_resources);
> > +
> >  static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
> >                 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> >                 const char *name)
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko
	<andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre"
	<nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	baiyaowei-0p4V/sDNsUmm0O/7XYngnFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
	"KY Srinivasan" <kys-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Frank Rowand"
	<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi"
	<lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Stephen Hemminger"
	<sthemmin-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	"Patrik Jakobsson"
	<patrik.r.jakobsson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-input <linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan"
	<gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	"Dave Young" <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Haiyang Zhang"
	<haiyangz-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst"
	<maarten.lankhorst-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:09:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705100939.GD1225@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfWLcQq4XGM3RyfO_ENx=3=WrCEhtOw+a0Sfwz_OpQ0UQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 07/04/18 at 07:46pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Baoquan He <bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > reparent_resources() is duplicated in arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > and arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, so move it to kernel/resource.c
> > so that it's shared.
> 
> With couple of comments below,

Sure, will fix these and repost with your reviewed-by, thanks. Should be
after I reproduce and fix those issues reported by test robot.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> P.S. In some commit message in this series you used 'likt' instead of 'like'.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 37 -------------------------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 35 -----------------------------------
> >  include/linux/ioport.h           |  1 +
> >  kernel/resource.c                | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > index f34346d56095..7899bafab064 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > @@ -619,43 +619,6 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int __init reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s [%llx..%llx] under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->start,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->end, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > index fe9733ffffaa..926035bb378d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > @@ -1088,41 +1088,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > index da0ebaec25f0..dfdcd0bfe54e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> >  struct resource *lookup_resource(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start);
> >  int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >                     resource_size_t size);
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res);
> >  resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res);
> >  static inline resource_size_t resource_size(const struct resource *res)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> > index 30e1bc68503b..d1cbf4b50e17 100644
> > --- a/kernel/resource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> > @@ -983,6 +983,45 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_resource);
> >
> > +/*
> 
> /** ?
> 
> > + * reparent_resources - reparent resource children of parent that res covers
> > + * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> > + * @res: resource descriptor desired by caller
> > + *
> > + * Reparent resource children of 'parent' that conflict with 'res'
> > + * under 'res', and make 'res' replace those children.
> 
> Describe error codes, please.
> 
> > + */
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > +       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > +
> > +       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > +               if (p->end < res->start)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (res->end < p->start)
> > +                       break;
> > +               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > +                       return -ENOTSUPP;       /* not completely contained */
> > +               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +                       firstpp = pp;
> > +       }
> > +       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +               return -ECANCELED; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > +       res->parent = parent;
> > +       res->child = *firstpp;
> > +       res->sibling = *pp;
> > +       *firstpp = res;
> > +       *pp = NULL;
> > +       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > +               p->parent = res;
> > +               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > +                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reparent_resources);
> > +
> >  static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
> >                 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> >                 const char *name)
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com,
	"KY Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	"Patrik Jakobsson" <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Jon Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
	"Chris Zankel" <chris@zankel.net>,
	"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"kbuild test robot" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:09:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705100939.GD1225@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfWLcQq4XGM3RyfO_ENx=3=WrCEhtOw+a0Sfwz_OpQ0UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/04/18 at 07:46pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > reparent_resources() is duplicated in arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > and arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, so move it to kernel/resource.c
> > so that it's shared.
> 
> With couple of comments below,

Sure, will fix these and repost with your reviewed-by, thanks. Should be
after I reproduce and fix those issues reported by test robot.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> 
> P.S. In some commit message in this series you used 'likt' instead of 'like'.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 37 -------------------------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 35 -----------------------------------
> >  include/linux/ioport.h           |  1 +
> >  kernel/resource.c                | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > index f34346d56095..7899bafab064 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > @@ -619,43 +619,6 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int __init reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s [%llx..%llx] under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->start,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->end, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > index fe9733ffffaa..926035bb378d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > @@ -1088,41 +1088,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > index da0ebaec25f0..dfdcd0bfe54e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> >  struct resource *lookup_resource(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start);
> >  int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >                     resource_size_t size);
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res);
> >  resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res);
> >  static inline resource_size_t resource_size(const struct resource *res)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> > index 30e1bc68503b..d1cbf4b50e17 100644
> > --- a/kernel/resource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> > @@ -983,6 +983,45 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_resource);
> >
> > +/*
> 
> /** ?
> 
> > + * reparent_resources - reparent resource children of parent that res covers
> > + * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> > + * @res: resource descriptor desired by caller
> > + *
> > + * Reparent resource children of 'parent' that conflict with 'res'
> > + * under 'res', and make 'res' replace those children.
> 
> Describe error codes, please.
> 
> > + */
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > +       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > +
> > +       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > +               if (p->end < res->start)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (res->end < p->start)
> > +                       break;
> > +               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > +                       return -ENOTSUPP;       /* not completely contained */
> > +               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +                       firstpp = pp;
> > +       }
> > +       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +               return -ECANCELED; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > +       res->parent = parent;
> > +       res->child = *firstpp;
> > +       res->sibling = *pp;
> > +       *firstpp = res;
> > +       *pp = NULL;
> > +       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > +               p->parent = res;
> > +               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > +                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reparent_resources);
> > +
> >  static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
> >                 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> >                 const char *name)
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Nicolas Pitre" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"kbuild test robot" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Patrik Jakobsson" <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"KY Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"Jon Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com, "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, "Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Chris Zankel" <chris@zankel.net>,
	"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:09:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705100939.GD1225@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfWLcQq4XGM3RyfO_ENx=3=WrCEhtOw+a0Sfwz_OpQ0UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/04/18 at 07:46pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > reparent_resources() is duplicated in arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > and arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, so move it to kernel/resource.c
> > so that it's shared.
> 
> With couple of comments below,

Sure, will fix these and repost with your reviewed-by, thanks. Should be
after I reproduce and fix those issues reported by test robot.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> 
> P.S. In some commit message in this series you used 'likt' instead of 'like'.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 37 -------------------------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 35 -----------------------------------
> >  include/linux/ioport.h           |  1 +
> >  kernel/resource.c                | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > index f34346d56095..7899bafab064 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> > @@ -619,43 +619,6 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int __init reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s [%llx..%llx] under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->start,
> > -                        (unsigned long long)p->end, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > index fe9733ffffaa..926035bb378d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > @@ -1088,41 +1088,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> >
> >  /*
> > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > - * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > - */
> > -static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent,
> > -                                    struct resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > -       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > -
> > -       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > -               if (p->end < res->start)
> > -                       continue;
> > -               if (res->end < p->start)
> > -                       break;
> > -               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > -                       return -1;      /* not completely contained */
> > -               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -                       firstpp = pp;
> > -       }
> > -       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > -               return -1;      /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > -       res->parent = parent;
> > -       res->child = *firstpp;
> > -       res->sibling = *pp;
> > -       *firstpp = res;
> > -       *pp = NULL;
> > -       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > -               p->parent = res;
> > -               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > -                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > -       }
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> >   *  Handle resources of PCI devices.  If the world were perfect, we could
> >   *  just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more.  It isn't.
> >   *  On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > index da0ebaec25f0..dfdcd0bfe54e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> >  struct resource *lookup_resource(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start);
> >  int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >                     resource_size_t size);
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res);
> >  resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res);
> >  static inline resource_size_t resource_size(const struct resource *res)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> > index 30e1bc68503b..d1cbf4b50e17 100644
> > --- a/kernel/resource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> > @@ -983,6 +983,45 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_resource);
> >
> > +/*
> 
> /** ?
> 
> > + * reparent_resources - reparent resource children of parent that res covers
> > + * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> > + * @res: resource descriptor desired by caller
> > + *
> > + * Reparent resource children of 'parent' that conflict with 'res'
> > + * under 'res', and make 'res' replace those children.
> 
> Describe error codes, please.
> 
> > + */
> > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource *p, **pp;
> > +       struct resource **firstpp = NULL;
> > +
> > +       for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) {
> > +               if (p->end < res->start)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (res->end < p->start)
> > +                       break;
> > +               if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end)
> > +                       return -ENOTSUPP;       /* not completely contained */
> > +               if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +                       firstpp = pp;
> > +       }
> > +       if (firstpp == NULL)
> > +               return -ECANCELED; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */
> > +       res->parent = parent;
> > +       res->child = *firstpp;
> > +       res->sibling = *pp;
> > +       *firstpp = res;
> > +       *pp = NULL;
> > +       for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) {
> > +               p->parent = res;
> > +               pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n",
> > +                        p->name, p, res->name);
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reparent_resources);
> > +
> >  static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
> >                 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> >                 const char *name)
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-04  4:10 [PATCH v6 0/4] resource: Use list_head to link sibling resource Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04 16:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-04 16:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-04 16:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-04 16:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-05 10:09     ` Baoquan He [this message]
2018-07-05 10:09       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-05 10:09       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-05 10:09       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] resource: Use list_head to link sibling resource Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04 17:00   ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00   ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-04 17:00     ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-08  2:59     ` Baoquan He
2018-07-08  2:59       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-08  2:59       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-08  2:59       ` Baoquan He
2018-07-08 17:48       ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-08 17:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-08 17:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-08 17:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-08 17:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-09  3:04         ` Baoquan He
2018-07-09  3:04           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-09  3:04           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-09  3:04           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-09  3:04           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-10  0:59       ` [kbuild-all] " Ye Xiaolong
2018-07-10  0:59         ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-07-10  0:59         ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-07-10  0:59         ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-07-10  3:10         ` Baoquan He
2018-07-10  3:10           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-10  3:10           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-10  3:10           ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] resource: add walk_system_ram_res_rev() Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] kexec_file: Load kernel at top of system RAM if required Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He
2018-07-04  4:10   ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180705100939.GD1225@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.