From: gregory.clement@bootlin.com (Gregory CLEMENT)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: mvneta: remove data pointer usage from device_node structure
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:18:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180713161841.11202-3-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713161841.11202-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
On year ago Rob Herring wanted to remove the data pointer from the
device_node structure[1]. The mvneta driver seemed to be the only one
which used (abused ?) it. However, the proposal of Rob to remove this
pointer from the driver introduced a regression, and I tested and fixed an
alternative way, but it was never submitted as a proper patch.
Now here it is: Instead of using the device_node structure ->data
pointer, we store the BM private data as the driver data of the BM
platform_device. The core mvneta code can retrieve it by doing a lookup
on which platform_device corresponds to the BM device tree node using
of_find_device_by_node(), and get its driver data
[1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg445197.html
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index ec84db47d82d..f4e3943a745d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4462,12 +4462,16 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Obtain access to BM resources if enabled and already initialized */
bm_node = of_parse_phandle(dn, "buffer-manager", 0);
- if (bm_node && bm_node->data) {
- pp->bm_priv = bm_node->data;
- err = mvneta_bm_port_init(pdev, pp);
- if (err < 0) {
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "use SW buffer management\n");
- pp->bm_priv = NULL;
+ if (bm_node) {
+ pp->bm_priv = mvneta_bm_get(bm_node);
+ if (pp->bm_priv) {
+ err = mvneta_bm_port_init(pdev, pp);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev,
+ "use SW buffer management\n");
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
+ pp->bm_priv = NULL;
+ }
}
}
of_node_put(bm_node);
@@ -4528,6 +4532,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_long, 1 << pp->id);
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_short,
1 << pp->id);
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
}
err_free_stats:
free_percpu(pp->stats);
@@ -4565,6 +4570,7 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_long, 1 << pp->id);
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_short,
1 << pp->id);
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
}
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
index 466939f8f0cf..de468e1bdba9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <net/hwbm.h>
@@ -392,6 +393,20 @@ static void mvneta_bm_put_sram(struct mvneta_bm *priv)
MVNETA_BM_BPPI_SIZE);
}
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
+
+ return pdev ? platform_get_drvdata(pdev) : NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mvneta_bm_get);
+
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv)
+{
+ platform_device_put(priv->pdev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mvneta_bm_put);
+
static int mvneta_bm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
index a32de432800c..9358626e51ec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ void *mvneta_frag_alloc(unsigned int frag_size);
void mvneta_frag_free(unsigned int frag_size, void *data);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MVNETA_BM)
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node);
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv);
+
void mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool, u8 port_map);
void mvneta_bm_bufs_free(struct mvneta_bm *priv, struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool,
@@ -178,5 +181,7 @@ static inline void mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
static inline u32 mvneta_bm_pool_get_bp(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool)
{ return 0; }
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_MVNETA_BM */
#endif
--
2.18.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Yelena Krivosheev" <yelena@marvell.com>,
"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
"Marcin Wojtas" <mw@semihalf.com>,
"Dmitri Epshtein" <dima@marvell.com>,
"Antoine Tenart" <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
"Miquèl Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: mvneta: remove data pointer usage from device_node structure
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:18:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180713161841.11202-3-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713161841.11202-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
On year ago Rob Herring wanted to remove the data pointer from the
device_node structure[1]. The mvneta driver seemed to be the only one
which used (abused ?) it. However, the proposal of Rob to remove this
pointer from the driver introduced a regression, and I tested and fixed an
alternative way, but it was never submitted as a proper patch.
Now here it is: Instead of using the device_node structure ->data
pointer, we store the BM private data as the driver data of the BM
platform_device. The core mvneta code can retrieve it by doing a lookup
on which platform_device corresponds to the BM device tree node using
of_find_device_by_node(), and get its driver data
[1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg445197.html
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index ec84db47d82d..f4e3943a745d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4462,12 +4462,16 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Obtain access to BM resources if enabled and already initialized */
bm_node = of_parse_phandle(dn, "buffer-manager", 0);
- if (bm_node && bm_node->data) {
- pp->bm_priv = bm_node->data;
- err = mvneta_bm_port_init(pdev, pp);
- if (err < 0) {
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "use SW buffer management\n");
- pp->bm_priv = NULL;
+ if (bm_node) {
+ pp->bm_priv = mvneta_bm_get(bm_node);
+ if (pp->bm_priv) {
+ err = mvneta_bm_port_init(pdev, pp);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev,
+ "use SW buffer management\n");
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
+ pp->bm_priv = NULL;
+ }
}
}
of_node_put(bm_node);
@@ -4528,6 +4532,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_long, 1 << pp->id);
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_short,
1 << pp->id);
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
}
err_free_stats:
free_percpu(pp->stats);
@@ -4565,6 +4570,7 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_long, 1 << pp->id);
mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(pp->bm_priv, pp->pool_short,
1 << pp->id);
+ mvneta_bm_put(pp->bm_priv);
}
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
index 466939f8f0cf..de468e1bdba9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <net/hwbm.h>
@@ -392,6 +393,20 @@ static void mvneta_bm_put_sram(struct mvneta_bm *priv)
MVNETA_BM_BPPI_SIZE);
}
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
+
+ return pdev ? platform_get_drvdata(pdev) : NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mvneta_bm_get);
+
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv)
+{
+ platform_device_put(priv->pdev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mvneta_bm_put);
+
static int mvneta_bm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
index a32de432800c..9358626e51ec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta_bm.h
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ void *mvneta_frag_alloc(unsigned int frag_size);
void mvneta_frag_free(unsigned int frag_size, void *data);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MVNETA_BM)
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node);
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv);
+
void mvneta_bm_pool_destroy(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool, u8 port_map);
void mvneta_bm_bufs_free(struct mvneta_bm *priv, struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool,
@@ -178,5 +181,7 @@ static inline void mvneta_bm_pool_put_bp(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
static inline u32 mvneta_bm_pool_get_bp(struct mvneta_bm *priv,
struct mvneta_bm_pool *bm_pool)
{ return 0; }
+struct mvneta_bm *mvneta_bm_get(struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
+void mvneta_bm_put(struct mvneta_bm *priv) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_MVNETA_BM */
#endif
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-13 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 16:18 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] A fix and a few improvements on mvneta Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: ethernet: mvneta: Fix napi structure mixup on armada 3700 Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: mvneta: remove data pointer usage from device_node structure Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] net: mvneta: increase number of buffers in RX and TX queue Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-07-13 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-07-18 15:37 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-18 15:37 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-18 20:55 ` Dave Taht
2018-07-18 20:55 ` Dave Taht
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: mvneta: discriminate error cause for missed packet Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: mvneta: Allocate page for the descriptor Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-14 1:23 ` David Miller
2018-07-14 1:23 ` David Miller
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] net: mvneta: Verify hardware checksum only when offload checksum feature is set Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] net: mvneta: Improve the buffer allocation method for SWBM Gregory CLEMENT
2018-07-13 16:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180713161841.11202-3-gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--to=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.