All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	khilman@kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	matthew.hart@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: next-20180723 build: 2 failures 11 warnings (next-20180723)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:16:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724091626.GC19324@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723181150.GF13981@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:59:12PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> Today's -next fails to build an arm64 allmodconfig with:
> 
> > 	arm64-allmodconfig
> > ERROR: "__sync_icache_dcache" [drivers/xen/xen-privcmd.ko] undefined!
> 
> using
> 
>    aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 5.3-2016.05) 5.3.1 20160412
> 
> however it builds perfectly fine with
> 
>    aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11) 6.2.1 20161016
> 
> which honestly seems like a sensible and worthwhile upgrade at this
> point anyway given that it's a year and a half old so I'm going to do
> that for my builder (perhaps even jump on a newer version) but it seemed
> worth highlighting in case this is considered undesirable.  A similar
> issue is hitting on KernelCI, we should probably look at upgrading the
> toolchain there too.

Hmm, it looks to me like this comes about because xen/privcmd.c is being
built as a module, but contains a call to set_pte_at() with a special pte:

	pte_t pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(page), r->prot));

	set_pte_at(r->mm, addr, ptep, pte);

which on arm64 contains:

	if (pte_present(pte) && pte_user_exec(pte) && !pte_special(pte))
		__sync_icache_dcache(pte);

so GCC 6 can optimise away the call to the non-exported symbol, but GCC 5
has trouble.

What I don't understand is why this suddenly cropped up. Did GCC 5 build
linux-next arm64 allmodconfig last week?

Cheers,

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: next-20180723 build: 2 failures 11 warnings (next-20180723)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:16:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724091626.GC19324@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723181150.GF13981@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:59:12PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> Today's -next fails to build an arm64 allmodconfig with:
> 
> > 	arm64-allmodconfig
> > ERROR: "__sync_icache_dcache" [drivers/xen/xen-privcmd.ko] undefined!
> 
> using
> 
>    aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 5.3-2016.05) 5.3.1 20160412
> 
> however it builds perfectly fine with
> 
>    aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11) 6.2.1 20161016
> 
> which honestly seems like a sensible and worthwhile upgrade at this
> point anyway given that it's a year and a half old so I'm going to do
> that for my builder (perhaps even jump on a newer version) but it seemed
> worth highlighting in case this is considered undesirable.  A similar
> issue is hitting on KernelCI, we should probably look at upgrading the
> toolchain there too.

Hmm, it looks to me like this comes about because xen/privcmd.c is being
built as a module, but contains a call to set_pte_at() with a special pte:

	pte_t pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(page), r->prot));

	set_pte_at(r->mm, addr, ptep, pte);

which on arm64 contains:

	if (pte_present(pte) && pte_user_exec(pte) && !pte_special(pte))
		__sync_icache_dcache(pte);

so GCC 6 can optimise away the call to the non-exported symbol, but GCC 5
has trouble.

What I don't understand is why this suddenly cropped up. Did GCC 5 build
linux-next arm64 allmodconfig last week?

Cheers,

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-24  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1fheAy-0003tU-Dq@optimist>
2018-07-23 18:11 ` next-20180723 build: 2 failures 11 warnings (next-20180723) Mark Brown
2018-07-23 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2018-07-24  9:16   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-07-24  9:16     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <CAH+k93GQRKO8s+0qkSH+d_2GkapMAp8C776Q4bZZnL37M5MBCw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-07-24  9:34       ` Matt Hart
2018-07-24  9:34         ` Matt Hart
2018-07-23 18:25 ` Mark Brown
2018-07-23 18:25   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180724091626.GC19324@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.hart@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.