Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance

[Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:07:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>Assuming we do indeed switch some parts of the drm process over to
>gitlab (very big assumption here), whom would we need to chat with to
>do that?

Hm... For the purposes of cregit or repository hosting?

>Atm what we're doing with patchwork is automatically add a Link: with
>the https:// patchwork url for that patch. Which then has links to the
>overall series, with CI results and discussions and all that. Plan for
>gitlab is to do something similar, if we start using it for real for
>anything. Would that be good enough?

That shouldn't be necessary in the near future. There is work under way 
for patchwork to accept message-id based URLs, so using the 
lkml.kernel.org/r/message-id URLs in commit messages should be enough 
for cregit to provide a link to the relevant patchwork thread. We will 
also probably end up integrating lore.kernel.org/patchwork with git in a 
way that would associate patches with final commit-ids and auto-archive 
them. It's not going to be 100% accurate for various reasons, but will 
at lest provide more hooks for projects like cregit to provide extra 
details about git commits.

-K

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]