Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance

[Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:49:13PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> 1. Allows people to generate an account
>> 2. Verifies their email address
>> 3. Instructs people how to generate a patch or series of patches
>> 4. Gives a way to upload generated patches
>> 5. Runs checkpatch to make sure there are no errors
>> 6. Runs get_maintainer to find out where the patch(es) should be sent to
>> 7. (Does more imaginary magic, such as looking up message-id references)
>> 8. Mails it out
>
>That last step might be hard, you have to "mail it out" to look like it
>came from the original author, right?  Then all crud breaks out as you
>can't deliver an email from "sony.com" successfully.

We already do nasty things to work around this. E.g. if you look at the 
envelope-sender for mail delivered via mail.kernel.org you'll see that 
it all looks like this: 
SRS0=crc=stuff=orig-domain.com=orig-local@kernel.org

So, mailing it out and having it pass DKIM/SPF checks to be reliably 
delivered is something we can do. Or, we can send it from 
"vapor-git-thingy@kernel.org" and put the original sender into Reply-To, 
which is also kosher.

>So you just provide them with a FOO1234@k.o account or some such
>munging, to reflect back to their original email address, but what
>happens when I ask for a change?  Are you now a "man in the middle"
>forwarding emails around everywhere?  That could get messy quickly.

It a reality we already live in, so it's not like we'd be exposing 
ourselves to anything we aren't exposed to as it is.

>Seriously, it would be good, but no gerrit please...

We'll call it ging for "ging is not gerrit". :)

-K

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]