From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nicolas.ferre@microchip.com" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com" <cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com" <Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:52:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181017115237.07310b74@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB1038EFA1E83AD78EBE84ECC499FF0@VI1PR04MB1038.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:46:30 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@bootlin.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus
> > <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> > dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com; richard@nod.at;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre@microchip.com;
> > cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@lists.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000
> > > > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file.
> > > > > For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I
> > > > > have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected
> > > > > flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also
> > > > > points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s",
> > > > > INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256
> > > > > * 1024, 256, ....}
> > > > >
> > > > > But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1
> > > > > protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are
> > > > > wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is
> > > > > being send as opcode instead of 0xEC.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try with the following patch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B
> > > mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.
> Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.
> > >
> >
> > Can you try with this patch applied?
> >
> With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly.
>
> [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8)
> [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc)
> [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
>
Okay, let's try this one to see why the SMPT parsing fails.
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 9407ca5f9443..564882c87641 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -2855,23 +2855,31 @@ static u8 spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(const struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 settings)
* spi_nor_get_map_in_use() - get the configuration map in use
* @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
* @smpt: pointer to the sector map parameter table
+ * @smpt_len: number of entries in the smpt array
*/
-static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)
+static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
+ u32 smpt_len)
{
const u32 *ret = NULL;
- u32 i, addr;
+ u32 i, addr, nmaps;
int err;
u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy;
u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id;
+ bool map_id_is_valid = false;
addr_width = nor->addr_width;
read_dummy = nor->read_dummy;
read_opcode = nor->read_opcode;
+ for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++)
+ pr_info("%s:%i smpt[%d] = %08x\n", __func__, __LINE__, i, smpt[i]);
+
map_id = 0;
- i = 0;
/* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */
- while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++) {
+ if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
+ break;
+
read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]);
nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]);
nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor, smpt[i]);
@@ -2887,18 +2895,40 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)
* Configuration that is currently in use.
*/
map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask);
+ map_id_is_valid = true;
i = i + 2;
}
+ if (map_id_is_valid)
+ pr_info("%s:%i map_id = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, map_id);
+ else
+ pr_info("%s:%i no map_id\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
/* Find the matching configuration map */
- while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) {
- if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END)
- goto out;
+ for (nmaps = 0; i < smpt_len; nmaps++) {
+ if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!map_id_is_valid) {
+ /*
+ * Command descriptors are optional but if we didn't
+ * find any, we should ensure we have only one map.
+ */
+ if (nmaps) {
+ ret = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ret = smpt + i;
+ } else if (map_id == SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i])) {
+ ret = smpt + i;
+ break;
+ }
+
/* increment the table index to the next map */
i += SMPT_MAP_REGION_COUNT(smpt[i]) + 1;
}
- ret = smpt + i;
/* fall through */
out:
nor->addr_width = addr_width;
@@ -3020,7 +3050,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_smpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
for (i = 0; i < smpt_header->length; i++)
smpt[i] = le32_to_cpu(smpt[i]);
- sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt);
+ sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt, smpt_header->length);
if (!sector_map) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
@@ -3132,6 +3162,17 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor,
switch (SFDP_PARAM_HEADER_ID(param_header)) {
case SFDP_SECTOR_MAP_ID:
err = spi_nor_parse_smpt(nor, param_header);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_warn(dev,
+ "failed to parse SMPT (err = %d)\n",
+ err);
+ /*
+ * SMPT parsing is optional, let's not drop
+ * all information we extracted so far just
+ * because it failed.
+ */
+ err = 0;
+ }
break;
default:
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:52:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181017115237.07310b74@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB1038EFA1E83AD78EBE84ECC499FF0@VI1PR04MB1038.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:46:30 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon at bootlin.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus
> > <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>; marek.vasut at gmail.com;
> > dwmw2 at infradead.org; computersforpeace at gmail.com; richard at nod.at;
> > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre at microchip.com;
> > cyrille.pitchen at microchip.com; linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan at microchip.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000
> > > > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file.
> > > > > For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I
> > > > > have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected
> > > > > flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also
> > > > > points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s",
> > > > > INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256
> > > > > * 1024, 256, ....}
> > > > >
> > > > > But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1
> > > > > protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are
> > > > > wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is
> > > > > being send as opcode instead of 0xEC.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try with the following patch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B
> > > mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.
> Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.
> > >
> >
> > Can you try with this patch applied?
> >
> With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly.
>
> [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8)
> [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc)
> [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
>
Okay, let's try this one to see why the SMPT parsing fails.
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 9407ca5f9443..564882c87641 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -2855,23 +2855,31 @@ static u8 spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(const struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 settings)
* spi_nor_get_map_in_use() - get the configuration map in use
* @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
* @smpt: pointer to the sector map parameter table
+ * @smpt_len: number of entries in the smpt array
*/
-static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)
+static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
+ u32 smpt_len)
{
const u32 *ret = NULL;
- u32 i, addr;
+ u32 i, addr, nmaps;
int err;
u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy;
u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id;
+ bool map_id_is_valid = false;
addr_width = nor->addr_width;
read_dummy = nor->read_dummy;
read_opcode = nor->read_opcode;
+ for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++)
+ pr_info("%s:%i smpt[%d] = %08x\n", __func__, __LINE__, i, smpt[i]);
+
map_id = 0;
- i = 0;
/* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */
- while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++) {
+ if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
+ break;
+
read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]);
nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]);
nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor, smpt[i]);
@@ -2887,18 +2895,40 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)
* Configuration that is currently in use.
*/
map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask);
+ map_id_is_valid = true;
i = i + 2;
}
+ if (map_id_is_valid)
+ pr_info("%s:%i map_id = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, map_id);
+ else
+ pr_info("%s:%i no map_id\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
/* Find the matching configuration map */
- while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) {
- if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END)
- goto out;
+ for (nmaps = 0; i < smpt_len; nmaps++) {
+ if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!map_id_is_valid) {
+ /*
+ * Command descriptors are optional but if we didn't
+ * find any, we should ensure we have only one map.
+ */
+ if (nmaps) {
+ ret = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ret = smpt + i;
+ } else if (map_id == SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i])) {
+ ret = smpt + i;
+ break;
+ }
+
/* increment the table index to the next map */
i += SMPT_MAP_REGION_COUNT(smpt[i]) + 1;
}
- ret = smpt + i;
/* fall through */
out:
nor->addr_width = addr_width;
@@ -3020,7 +3050,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_smpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
for (i = 0; i < smpt_header->length; i++)
smpt[i] = le32_to_cpu(smpt[i]);
- sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt);
+ sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt, smpt_header->length);
if (!sector_map) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
@@ -3132,6 +3162,17 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor,
switch (SFDP_PARAM_HEADER_ID(param_header)) {
case SFDP_SECTOR_MAP_ID:
err = spi_nor_parse_smpt(nor, param_header);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_warn(dev,
+ "failed to parse SMPT (err = %d)\n",
+ err);
+ /*
+ * SMPT parsing is optional, let's not drop
+ * all information we extracted so far just
+ * because it failed.
+ */
+ err = 0;
+ }
break;
default:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 15:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 15:40 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: " Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 15:40 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 18:55 ` Marek Vasut
2018-09-11 18:55 ` Marek Vasut
2018-09-17 17:03 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-17 17:03 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-16 9:51 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-16 9:51 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-16 12:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-16 12:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-16 12:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-16 12:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 1:54 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-16 15:14 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-16 15:14 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-16 16:34 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-10-16 16:34 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-10-17 2:07 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 2:07 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 3:50 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 3:50 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 7:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 7:46 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 7:46 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 8:00 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-17 8:00 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-17 8:20 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 8:20 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-17 9:52 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-10-17 9:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 6:04 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 6:04 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 7:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 7:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 8:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 8:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 8:32 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 8:32 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 8:33 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-22 8:33 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-10-22 9:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 9:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:03 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:03 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:17 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:17 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:39 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:39 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 10:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 10:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 11:03 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 11:03 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 11:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 11:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 11:46 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 11:46 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-22 11:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 11:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 4:47 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 4:47 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 5:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 5:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 8:18 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 8:18 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 8:59 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 8:59 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:05 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 9:05 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 9:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-23 9:15 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-23 9:15 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-10-17 9:06 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-10-17 9:06 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: parse SFDP Sector Map Parameter Table Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 15:40 ` Tudor Ambarus
2018-09-11 18:56 ` Marek Vasut
2018-09-11 18:56 ` Marek Vasut
2018-09-18 13:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories Boris Brezillon
2018-09-18 13:09 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181017115237.07310b74@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.