All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <peng.hao2@zte.com.cn>
To: <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] target-i386: add rtc 0x70 port as coalesced_pio
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:43:19 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201810181843190635824@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99cf25d1-3a3a-085e-8012-0a3fd8914779@redhat.com>

>On 18/10/2018 10:03, peng.hao2@zte.com.cn wrote:
>>>> +    /* register rtc 0x70 port as coalesced_pio */
>>>> +    memory_region_set_flush_coalesced(&s->io);
>>>> +    memory_region_init_io(&s->coalesced_io, OBJECT(s), &cmos_ops,
>>>> +                          s, "rtc1", 1);
>>>> +    isa_register_ioport(isadev, &s->coalesced_io, base);
>>> I think instead of isa_register_ioport you can use
>>> memory_region_add_subregion, so that s->coalesced_io is added below s->io?
>>>
>> isa_register_ioport also called memory_region_add_subregion.
>> modify code  like this:
>>   //isa_register_ioport(isadev, &s->coalesced_io, base);
>>     memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_io(),0x70,&s->coalesced_io);
>> The regional distribution before and after code modification is consistent.
>
>Right, but I'd rather add s->coalesced_io subregion as a subregion of
>s->io at offset 0.
Ok, I will modify it and resubmit the patch.
By the way , I find that  when I adjusted the format of the patch "PATCH V6 1/5", I made a mistake to modify a code character. I also resubmit the patch.
Thanks.
>
>Paolo
>
>>    0000000000000070-0000000000000070 (prio 0, i/o): rtc1
>>     0000000000000070-0000000000000071 (prio 0, i/o): rtc

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <peng.hao2@zte.com.cn>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V6 3/5] target-i386: add rtc 0x70 port as coalesced_pio
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:43:19 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201810181843190635824@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99cf25d1-3a3a-085e-8012-0a3fd8914779@redhat.com>

>On 18/10/2018 10:03, peng.hao2@zte.com.cn wrote:
>>>> +    /* register rtc 0x70 port as coalesced_pio */
>>>> +    memory_region_set_flush_coalesced(&s->io);
>>>> +    memory_region_init_io(&s->coalesced_io, OBJECT(s), &cmos_ops,
>>>> +                          s, "rtc1", 1);
>>>> +    isa_register_ioport(isadev, &s->coalesced_io, base);
>>> I think instead of isa_register_ioport you can use
>>> memory_region_add_subregion, so that s->coalesced_io is added below s->io?
>>>
>> isa_register_ioport also called memory_region_add_subregion.
>> modify code  like this:
>>   //isa_register_ioport(isadev, &s->coalesced_io, base);
>>     memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_io(),0x70,&s->coalesced_io);
>> The regional distribution before and after code modification is consistent.
>
>Right, but I'd rather add s->coalesced_io subregion as a subregion of
>s->io at offset 0.
Ok, I will modify it and resubmit the patch.
By the way , I find that  when I adjusted the format of the patch "PATCH V6 1/5", I made a mistake to modify a code character. I also resubmit the patch.
Thanks.
>
>Paolo
>
>>    0000000000000070-0000000000000070 (prio 0, i/o): rtc1
>>     0000000000000070-0000000000000071 (prio 0, i/o): rtc

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-17 16:52 [PATCH 0/5] target/i386: introduce coalesced pio Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] target/i386 : add coalesced pio support Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 15:04   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-17 15:04     ` [Qemu-devel] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-17 17:05     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-17 17:05       ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] target-i386 : add coalesced_pio API Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] target-i386: add rtc 0x70 port as coalesced_pio Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 10:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-17 10:31     ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-18  8:03     ` peng.hao2
2018-10-18  8:03       ` [Qemu-devel] " peng.hao2
2018-10-18 10:13       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-18 10:13         ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-18 10:43         ` peng.hao2 [this message]
2018-10-18 10:43           ` peng.hao2
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] target-i386: add i440fx 0xcf8 " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] target-i386: add q35 " Peng Hao
2018-10-17 16:52   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peng Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201810181843190635824@zte.com.cn \
    --to=peng.hao2@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.