All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 2/7] clk: imx: add scu clock common part
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:27:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217112752.07e43d05@karo-electronics.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4211E44C3B64033C3795BDB380A60@AM0PR04MB4211.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:35:48 +0000 Aisheng Dong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd@kernel.org]
> > Quoting Aisheng DONG (2018-12-04 06:39:25)  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig index
> > > 43a3ecc..63e7b01 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig
> > > @@ -3,3 +3,7 @@
> > >  config MXC_CLK
> > >         bool
> > >         depends on ARCH_MXC
> > > +
> > > +config MXC_CLK_SCU  
> > 
> > Is there any reason to make this a hidden option instead of making it a
> > selectable option? It can still depend on ARCH_MXC and ARM64, but otherwise
> > it should be compilable as long as CONFIG_IMX_SCU is defined (this should
> > also be a config we depend on here).
> >   
> 
> This is mostly following the exist using that CLK is selected by SoC config option.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10677309/
> 
> As CLK usually is required for platform to run well, so we did not make it selectable.
> 
> > > +       bool
> > > +       depends on ARCH_MXC && ARM64
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile index
> > > f850424..4abed37 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK) += \
> > >         clk-pllv4.o \
> > >         clk-sccg-pll.o
> > >
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += \
> > > +       clk-scu.o
> > > +
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX1)   += clk-imx1.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX21)  += clk-imx21.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX25)  += clk-imx25.o diff --git
> > > a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c new file mode
> > > 100644 index 0000000..ec8a471
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright 2018 NXP
> > > + *   Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "clk-scu.h"
> > > +
> > > +struct imx_sc_ipc *ccm_ipc_handle;  
> > 
> > Why does this need to be a global? Can it be in each clk_scu instance instead?
> >   
> 
> No, no need to be in each clk_scu instance.
> There's only one handler.
> 
Shouldn't it be 'static'?


Lothar Waßmann

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 2/7] clk: imx: add scu clock common part
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:27:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217112752.07e43d05@karo-electronics.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4211E44C3B64033C3795BDB380A60@AM0PR04MB4211.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:35:48 +0000 Aisheng Dong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd@kernel.org]
> > Quoting Aisheng DONG (2018-12-04 06:39:25)  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig index
> > > 43a3ecc..63e7b01 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig
> > > @@ -3,3 +3,7 @@
> > >  config MXC_CLK
> > >         bool
> > >         depends on ARCH_MXC
> > > +
> > > +config MXC_CLK_SCU  
> > 
> > Is there any reason to make this a hidden option instead of making it a
> > selectable option? It can still depend on ARCH_MXC and ARM64, but otherwise
> > it should be compilable as long as CONFIG_IMX_SCU is defined (this should
> > also be a config we depend on here).
> >   
> 
> This is mostly following the exist using that CLK is selected by SoC config option.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10677309/
> 
> As CLK usually is required for platform to run well, so we did not make it selectable.
> 
> > > +       bool
> > > +       depends on ARCH_MXC && ARM64
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile index
> > > f850424..4abed37 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK) += \
> > >         clk-pllv4.o \
> > >         clk-sccg-pll.o
> > >
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += \
> > > +       clk-scu.o
> > > +
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX1)   += clk-imx1.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX21)  += clk-imx21.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX25)  += clk-imx25.o diff --git
> > > a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c new file mode
> > > 100644 index 0000000..ec8a471
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright 2018 NXP
> > > + *   Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "clk-scu.h"
> > > +
> > > +struct imx_sc_ipc *ccm_ipc_handle;  
> > 
> > Why does this need to be a global? Can it be in each clk_scu instance instead?
> >   
> 
> No, no need to be in each clk_scu instance.
> There's only one handler.
> 
Shouldn't it be 'static'?


Lothar Waßmann

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-17 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 14:39 [PATCH V9 0/7] clk: imx: add imx8qxp clock support Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 1/7] clk: imx: add configuration option for mmio clks Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-10 20:55   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-10 20:55     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-11  2:36     ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11  2:36       ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11 19:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-11 19:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-12  1:09         ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-12  1:09           ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-12 10:27           ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-12 10:27             ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-12 22:23             ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-12 22:23               ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-13  0:32               ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-13  0:32                 ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 2/7] clk: imx: add scu clock common part Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-10 21:56   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-10 21:56     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-11  3:35     ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11  3:35       ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-17 10:27       ` Lothar Waßmann [this message]
2018-12-17 10:27         ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-12-17 10:30         ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-17 10:30           ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 3/7] dt-bindings: clock: imx8qxp: add SCU clock IDs Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 4/7] clk: imx: add imx8qxp clk driver Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 5/7] dt-bindings: clock: add imx8qxp lpcg clock binding Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 6/7] clk: imx: add lpcg clock support Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39 ` [PATCH V9 7/7] clk: imx: add imx8qxp lpcg driver Aisheng DONG
2018-12-04 14:39   ` Aisheng DONG
2018-12-10 20:46 ` [PATCH V9 0/7] clk: imx: add imx8qxp clock support Stephen Boyd
2018-12-10 20:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-11  2:04   ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11  2:04     ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11  4:05   ` Aisheng Dong
2018-12-11  4:05     ` Aisheng Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181217112752.07e43d05@karo-electronics.de \
    --to=lw@karo-electronics.de \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.