From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again after nand_detect
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:16:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207111606.6b72dc34@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549533476-3742-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Hi Masahiro,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote on Thu, 7 Feb
2019 18:57:56 +0900:
> nand_scan_ident() calls onfi_fill_data_interface() at its entry
> to set up the initial timing parameters.
>
> The timing parameters are needed not only for ->setup_data_interface(),
> but also for giving the correct delay to NAND_OP_WAIT_RDY, for example.
>
> If the driver sets the NAND_KEEP_TIMINGS flag, or does not support
> ->setup_data_interface() hook, those parameters will never updated.
^ be
>
> Before nand_detect(), we never know whether the chip is ONFi or not.
> So, onfi_fill_data_interface() has to assume the worst case, i.e.
> non-ONFi.
s/ONFi/ONFI/?
>
> After nand_detect(), if the chip turns out to be ONFi-compliant,
> we can optimize tPROG_max, tBERS_max, etc.
>
> Call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again.
Sorry but I don't get why this is needed as there is the same call at
the top of this function. Can you be more specific on where/when the
missing call produces a failure?
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 9b3d7ff..35e543c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -5040,6 +5040,9 @@ static int nand_scan_ident(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int maxchips,
>
> nand_deselect_target(chip);
>
> + /* If the chip turns out ONFi, we can optimize timing parameters. */
> + onfi_fill_data_interface(chip, NAND_SDR_IFACE, 0);
> +
> /* Check for a chip array */
> for (i = 1; i < maxchips; i++) {
> u8 id[2];
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again after nand_detect
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:16:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207111606.6b72dc34@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549533476-3742-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Hi Masahiro,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote on Thu, 7 Feb
2019 18:57:56 +0900:
> nand_scan_ident() calls onfi_fill_data_interface() at its entry
> to set up the initial timing parameters.
>
> The timing parameters are needed not only for ->setup_data_interface(),
> but also for giving the correct delay to NAND_OP_WAIT_RDY, for example.
>
> If the driver sets the NAND_KEEP_TIMINGS flag, or does not support
> ->setup_data_interface() hook, those parameters will never updated.
^ be
>
> Before nand_detect(), we never know whether the chip is ONFi or not.
> So, onfi_fill_data_interface() has to assume the worst case, i.e.
> non-ONFi.
s/ONFi/ONFI/?
>
> After nand_detect(), if the chip turns out to be ONFi-compliant,
> we can optimize tPROG_max, tBERS_max, etc.
>
> Call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again.
Sorry but I don't get why this is needed as there is the same call at
the top of this function. Can you be more specific on where/when the
missing call produces a failure?
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 9b3d7ff..35e543c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -5040,6 +5040,9 @@ static int nand_scan_ident(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int maxchips,
>
> nand_deselect_target(chip);
>
> + /* If the chip turns out ONFi, we can optimize timing parameters. */
> + onfi_fill_data_interface(chip, NAND_SDR_IFACE, 0);
> +
> /* Check for a chip array */
> for (i = 1; i < maxchips; i++) {
> u8 id[2];
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-07 9:57 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again after nand_detect Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 9:57 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 10:16 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-02-07 10:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-07 10:46 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 10:46 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 10:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 10:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-07 13:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-07 13:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-08 8:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-08 8:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-08 21:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-08 21:45 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190207111606.6b72dc34@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.