From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25dfde77-fdad-0b99-75ec-4ba480058970@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
* Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> I _am_ bending the C rules a bit with the "extern some_var; asm
> volatile(".section some_section\nsome_var: blabla");". I should
> probably ask on the gcc list whether this way of defining a local
> symbol in inline assembly and referring to it from C is supposed to
> work, or it just happens to work by chance.
Doing that would be rather useful I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25dfde77-fdad-0b99-75ec-4ba480058970@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
* Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> I _am_ bending the C rules a bit with the "extern some_var; asm
> volatile(".section some_section\nsome_var: blabla");". I should
> probably ask on the gcc list whether this way of defining a local
> symbol in inline assembly and referring to it from C is supposed to
> work, or it just happens to work by chance.
Doing that would be rather useful I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25dfde77-fdad-0b99-75ec-4ba480058970@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
* Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> I _am_ bending the C rules a bit with the "extern some_var; asm
> volatile(".section some_section\nsome_var: blabla");". I should
> probably ask on the gcc list whether this way of defining a local
> symbol in inline assembly and referring to it from C is supposed to
> work, or it just happens to work by chance.
Doing that would be rather useful I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 21:25 [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] linux/device.h: use unique identifier for each struct _ddebug Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] linux/net.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] linux/printk.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] dynamic_debug: introduce accessors for string members of " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] dynamic_debug: drop use of bitfields in " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] dynamic_debug: introduce CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] dynamic_debug: add asm-generic implementation for DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86-64: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-10 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-26 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-26 10:05 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 10:05 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 13:00 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-26 13:00 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/10] arm64: unbreak DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y build with clang Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/10] powerpc: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-29 17:34 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-29 17:34 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-26 19:27 ` [PATCH 11/10] arm64: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:27 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 21:58 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 21:58 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 22:07 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 22:07 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-29 17:32 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-29 17:32 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-30 18:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-30 18:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-05-02 8:57 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-02 8:57 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] powerpc: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS for PPC64 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-23 15:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-23 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-23 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-24 6:46 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-24 6:46 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 6:48 ` [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 6:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 6:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 7:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-05-06 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 14:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-06 14:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-06 14:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.