All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	jannh@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
	shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com,
	ldv@altlinux.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd == -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	jannh@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
	shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com,
	ldv@altlinux.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 16:57:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd = -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd == -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190522165737.LMXotlDGBmIpxaOHJEuTHGRyJ5yE-F83COoqM-OIHvw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd == -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	ldv@altlinux.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, x86@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, tkjos@android.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	jannh@google.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd == -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	ldv@altlinux.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, x86@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, tkjos@android.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	jannh@google.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522155259.11174-1-christian@brauner.io>

On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct file *file = NULL;
>  	struct fdtable *fdt;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
>  	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> -	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return filp_close(file, files);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> -	return -EBADF;
> +	return file;

...

> +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cur_max;
> +
> +	if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> +	if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> +		max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> +
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(files, fd++);

Well, how about something like

	static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
	{
		unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
		unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
		unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;

		bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
		if (bitbit > maxfd)
			return maxfd;
		if (bitbit > start)
			start = bitbit;
		return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
	}

	unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
	{
		unsigned fd;
		struct file *file;
		struct fdtable *fdt;
	
		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
		fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
		if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
			fd = -1;
			goto out;
		}

		file = fdt->fd[fd];
		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
		__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
	out:
		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);

		if (fd == -1u)
			return fd;

		filp_close(file, files);
		return fd + 1;
	}

?

Then close_range() can do

	while (fd < max_fd)
		fd = close_next_fd(fd, maxfd);

Oleg.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-22 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22 15:52 [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` christian
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] tests: add close_range() tests Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52   ` christian
2019-05-22 15:52   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-05-22 16:57   ` [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57   ` oleg
2019-05-22 16:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 11:51   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51     ` christian
2019-05-23 11:51     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14       ` christian
2019-05-23 14:14       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28         ` christian
2019-05-23 14:28         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:21         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21           ` oleg
2019-05-23 16:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 14:32     ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32       ` jannh
2019-05-23 14:32       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:37       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37         ` christian
2019-05-23 14:37         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22   ` khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:29   ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David.Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29     ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:33   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33     ` christian
2019-05-23 16:33     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  7:43     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  7:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  7:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  7:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  7:43       ` arnd
2019-05-24  7:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  7:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24  9:57       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  9:57         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  9:57         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  9:57         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  9:57         ` christian
2019-05-24  9:57         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24  9:57         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31     ` christian
2019-05-24 10:31     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.