From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
jannh@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com,
ldv@altlinux.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
jannh@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com,
ldv@altlinux.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 16:21:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190523162104.RW0rUXG9fMjY8b7QzT9T8dHl516-dhv5ukm3acSBnaU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
ldv@altlinux.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, x86@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, tkjos@android.com, arnd@arndb.de,
jannh@google.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
ldv@altlinux.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, x86@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, tkjos@android.com, arnd@arndb.de,
jannh@google.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523142826.omb7vgygudifmveq@brauner.io>
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think
> sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better
> for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 15:52 [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` christian
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] tests: add close_range() tests Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` christian
2019-05-22 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 16:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:57 ` oleg
2019-05-22 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 11:51 ` christian
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:14 ` christian
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` christian
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:21 ` oleg
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32 ` jannh
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:32 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37 ` christian
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David.Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33 ` christian
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 7:43 ` arnd
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 9:57 ` christian
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` christian
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523162104.GD23070@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.