All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:19:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523101953.GA18805@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522174812.5597-3-keith.busch@intel.com>

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:48:12AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> The nvme controller may pause command processing during firmware
> activation. The driver will quiesce queues during this time, but commands
> dispatched prior to the notification will not be processed until the
> hardware completes this activation.
> 
> We do not want those requests to time out while the hardware is in
> this paused state as we don't expect those commands to complete during
> this time, and that handling will interfere with the firmware activation
> process.
> 
> In addition to quiescing the queues, halt timeout detection during the
> paused state and reset the dispatched request deadlines when the hardware
> exists that state. This action applies to IO and admin queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 1b7c2afd84cb..37a9a66ada22 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static dev_t nvme_chr_devt;
>  static struct class *nvme_class;
>  static struct class *nvme_subsys_class;
>  
> +static void nvme_reset_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
>  static int nvme_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk);
>  static void nvme_put_subsystem(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys);
>  static void nvme_remove_invalid_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> @@ -3605,6 +3606,11 @@ static void nvme_fw_act_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(admin_timeout * 1000);
>  
>  	nvme_stop_queues(ctrl);
> +	nvme_sync_queues(ctrl);
> +
> +	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ctrl->admin_q);
> +	blk_sync_queue(ctrl->admin_q);

blk_sync_queue() may not halt timeout detection completely since the
timeout work may reset timer again.

Also reset still may come during activating FW, is that a problem?


Thanks,
Ming

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:19:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523101953.GA18805@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522174812.5597-3-keith.busch@intel.com>

On Wed, May 22, 2019@11:48:12AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> The nvme controller may pause command processing during firmware
> activation. The driver will quiesce queues during this time, but commands
> dispatched prior to the notification will not be processed until the
> hardware completes this activation.
> 
> We do not want those requests to time out while the hardware is in
> this paused state as we don't expect those commands to complete during
> this time, and that handling will interfere with the firmware activation
> process.
> 
> In addition to quiescing the queues, halt timeout detection during the
> paused state and reset the dispatched request deadlines when the hardware
> exists that state. This action applies to IO and admin queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 1b7c2afd84cb..37a9a66ada22 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static dev_t nvme_chr_devt;
>  static struct class *nvme_class;
>  static struct class *nvme_subsys_class;
>  
> +static void nvme_reset_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
>  static int nvme_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk);
>  static void nvme_put_subsystem(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys);
>  static void nvme_remove_invalid_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> @@ -3605,6 +3606,11 @@ static void nvme_fw_act_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(admin_timeout * 1000);
>  
>  	nvme_stop_queues(ctrl);
> +	nvme_sync_queues(ctrl);
> +
> +	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ctrl->admin_q);
> +	blk_sync_queue(ctrl->admin_q);

blk_sync_queue() may not halt timeout detection completely since the
timeout work may reset timer again.

Also reset still may come during activating FW, is that a problem?


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22 17:48 [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: provide way to reset rq deadline Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:19   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-05-23 10:19     ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23 13:34     ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 13:34       ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:07       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 14:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Bart Van Assche
2019-05-22 20:20   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-22 20:28   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-22 20:28     ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:04     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-23 10:04       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-23  3:29 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23  3:29   ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23  3:48   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23  3:48     ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 10:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 13:23       ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 13:23         ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:10         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 14:10           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 14:19           ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:19             ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190523101953.GA18805@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.